Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Google Workspace

Google Workspace Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

google.com

Google Workspace is how teams of all sizes do their best work.


Google Workspace A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Google Workspace
Company Information
Website:http://workspace.google.com
Employees number:3
Number of followers:725,220
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:google.com
Google Workspace Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 550 and 599
logo
Google WorkspaceSoftware Development
Updated:
04/05/2026
558/1000
Very Poor
Ca
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Google Workspace Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Google WorkspaceSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Google Workspace
Google WorkspaceVery Poor
Current Score
558Ca (VERY POOR)
01000
3 incidents
-66.67 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
564Before Incident
MAY 2026
558Before Incident
APRIL 2026
557Before Incident
MARCH 2026
713Before Incident
Breach
20 Mar 2026Google Workspace
Notion, Slack, Google, Zoom, Nikkei and Workday: Your work apps are quietly handing 19 data points to someone

Workplace Apps Collect Extensive User Data, Raising Privacy and Security Concerns

552After Incident
CRITICAL-161
WORNOTGOOZOONIKTIN1777868873
Workplace Apps Collect Extensive User Data, Raising Privacy and Security Concerns A recent study by Incogni, analyzing data from the Google Play Store as of March 20, 2026, reveals that ten widely used workplace apps including Gmail, Microsoft Teams, Zoom Workplace, Slack, and Notion collect an average of 19 data points per app, with some sharing sensitive information with third parties. These apps, cumulatively downloaded over 12.5 billion times, are integral to U.S. corporate operations but pose significant privacy and security risks. Data Collection and Sharing Practices Gmail leads in data harvesting, collecting 26 distinct data types, including approximate location, app interactions, and user IDs for advertising. Microsoft Teams and Zoom Workplace follow closely, with 25 and 23 data types, respectively both uniquely gathering precise location data. Six of the ten apps, including Slack, Notion, and Zoom Workplace, use collected data for marketing, with Slack, Todoist, and Notion specifically harvesting employee email addresses for this purpose. Notion stands out for its outbound data flow, sharing eight data types such as email addresses, names, and device IDs with third parties, including advertising partners. The app’s privacy policy permits tracking tools on user browsers, raising concerns over the exposure of sensitive workspace content like HR records and client data. Regulatory scrutiny has intensified, particularly after the EU’s Data Protection Board tightened GDPR requirements in December 2024 regarding personal data use in AI training, directly impacting Notion’s third-party model integrations. Security Vulnerabilities and Breach History Most apps in the study have a history of breaches. In January 2026, a 96-gigabyte database containing 149 million login credentials 48 million tied to Gmail was exposed, attributed to infostealer malware on user devices. Slack suffered a November 2025 breach where attackers used stolen credentials to access accounts of over 17,000 Nikkei employees, exposing names, emails, and chat histories. Trello, Zoom, and Microsoft products have also faced incidents, with Trello data appearing for sale in January 2024. Workday is the only app in the analysis without a user data deletion option, despite holding employment records and payroll details. In August 2025, the platform confirmed two breaches linked to its Salesforce CRM, where attackers obtained business contact information as part of a ShinyHunters social engineering campaign. BYOD Risks and Platform Disparities Many employees install these apps on personal devices, exposing contact details, financial data, and location information to advertising networks or corporate administrators. Slack, for example, lacks end-to-end encryption, allowing workspace owners to access direct messages and private channels. While the study focuses on Google Play data, Incogni notes that iOS disclosures may differ, though past comparisons suggest similar privacy practices across platforms. The findings highlight the trade-offs between workplace productivity and data exposure, with recurring breaches and extensive tracking underscoring the risks of integrating these tools into daily operations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data CollectionPrivacy ViolationData Breach
MOTIVATION
Data Harvesting for AdvertisingFinancial GainEspionage
IMPACT
Login CredentialsEmail AddressesNamesChat HistoriesEmployment RecordsPayroll DetailsDevice IDsLocation DataGmailMicrosoft TeamsZoom WorkplaceSlackNotionTrelloWorkdayOperational Impact: Exposure of sensitive workspace content and corporate dataBrand Reputation Impact: Increased regulatory scrutiny and loss of user trustGDPR ViolationsPotential FinesIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Login CredentialsEmail AddressesNamesChat HistoriesEmployment RecordsPayroll DetailsDevice IDsLocation Data149 million (Gmail-related)17,000 (Slack)Sensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: YesData Encryption: Lacking in some cases (e.g., Slack)Email AddressesNamesEmployment RecordsPayroll Details
MARCH 2026
733Before Incident
Cyber Attack
04 Mar 2026Google Workspace
Microsoft and Google: Microsoft Warns of Advanced Phishing Campaign Abusing OAuth in Entra ID

Sophisticated Phishing Campaigns Abusing OAuth 2.0 Redirects

712After Incident
CRITICAL-21
MICGOO1772628247
Microsoft Uncovers Sophisticated Phishing Campaigns Abusing OAuth 2.0 Redirects Microsoft has identified a series of phishing attacks targeting government and public-sector organizations by exploiting OAuth 2.0’s redirection features in Microsoft Entra ID and Google Workspace. Unlike traditional credential theft, these campaigns bypass email filters by weaponizing trusted authentication protocols to deliver malware. ### Attack Mechanics Threat actors register malicious apps in their tenant, configuring redirect URIs to point to phishing or malware-hosting domains. Phishing emails disguised as e-signature requests, Teams invites, or password resets lure victims into clicking links that trigger a silent OAuth flow. By manipulating parameters like `prompt=none` and `scope=invalid`, attackers force error redirects without user interaction, masking malicious URLs from scanners. The `state` parameter encodes the victim’s email in Base64, hex, or custom schemes, auto-populating phishing pages for realism. Once clicked, victims are redirected to tools like EvilProxy for session hijacking or prompted to download a ZIP file containing a malicious LNK file. This executes PowerShell for host reconnaissance, then sideloads `crashhandler.dll` via a legitimate `steam_monitor.exe` process to establish command-and-control (C2) communication. ### Detection & Indicators The attack does not exploit vulnerabilities but abuses OAuth 2.0 protocol behavior as outlined in RFC 6749/9700. Key indicators include: - URL Parameters: `prompt=none`, `scope=invalid` (triggers silent redirects) - File Artifacts: `steam_monitor.exe`, `crashhandler.dll`, `crashlog.dat` (DLL sideloading) - Defender Signatures: `Trojan:Win32/Malgent`, `Trojan:Win32/Znyonm`, `Trojan:Win32/WinLNK` - Error Codes: `65001`, `error=interaction_required` (failed SSO, successful redirect) ### Mitigation Strategies Microsoft recommends OAuth governance over patching, including: - App Audits: Regularly review overprivileged OAuth applications. - Access Controls: Enforce Conditional Access and identity protection. - Telemetry & Hunting: Use XDR for cross-signal correlation, flagging anomalies like PowerShell execution from LNK files or DLL sideloading. The campaign underscores the growing trend of protocol abuse in phishing, where attackers leverage legitimate features to evade detection.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing
IMPACT
Microsoft Entra IDGoogle WorkspaceIdentity Theft Risk: High (session hijacking via EvilProxy)
DATA BREACH
LNKDLLZIPPersonally Identifiable Information: Email addresses (encoded in `state` parameter)
FEBRUARY 2026
733Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
751Before Incident
Cyber Attack
23 Jan 2026Google Workspace
Okta, Salesforce and Google: ShinyHunters claim to be behind SSO-account data theft attacks

ShinyHunters Gang Behind Vishing Attacks Targeting SSO Accounts at Okta, Microsoft, and Google

733After Incident
CRITICAL-18
OKTSALGOO1769222214
ShinyHunters Gang Behind Vishing Attacks Targeting SSO Accounts at Okta, Microsoft, and Google The extortion group ShinyHunters has claimed responsibility for a series of voice phishing (vishing) attacks targeting single sign-on (SSO) accounts at Okta, Microsoft Entra, and Google, enabling threat actors to breach corporate SaaS platforms and steal data for extortion. In these attacks, cybercriminals impersonate IT support staff, calling employees and tricking them into entering credentials and multi-factor authentication (MFA) codes on phishing sites mimicking legitimate login portals. Once compromised, the attackers gain access to the victim’s SSO account, which often serves as a gateway to connected enterprise applications, including Salesforce, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Dropbox, Slack, and Atlassian. The phishing kits used in these attacks feature real-time control panels, allowing attackers to dynamically adjust phishing pages during calls prompting victims to approve MFA requests or enter one-time codes as needed. Okta confirmed the use of such kits in a recent report, though it declined to comment on the breaches themselves. ShinyHunters told BleepingComputer that it is behind some of the attacks, with Salesforce as its primary target, though other platforms are also exploited. The group leverages stolen employee data including phone numbers, job titles, and names from previous breaches to make social engineering calls more convincing. Recent victims listed on ShinyHunters’ Tor data leak site include SoundCloud, Betterment, and Crunchbase. While SoundCloud and Betterment had previously disclosed breaches, Crunchbase confirmed a new incident involving data exfiltration from its corporate network, though no operational disruptions occurred. The company has engaged cybersecurity experts and law enforcement. Microsoft and Google have not reported evidence of their products being abused in the campaign, with Google stating it has no indication its systems were affected. ShinyHunters disputed Okta’s attribution of a specific phishing kit, claiming its infrastructure was built in-house.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vishing (Voice Phishing)
MOTIVATION
Extortion, Data Theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Corporate data, Employee credentials, MFA codesSSO AccountsSaaS Platforms (Salesforce, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Dropbox, Slack, Atlassian)Operational Impact: Data exfiltration, Unauthorized access to corporate networksBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to data breachesIdentity Theft Risk: High (stolen employee and customer data)
DATA BREACH
Employee credentialsMFA codesCorporate dataSensitivity Of Data: High (Personally Identifiable Information, Corporate Data)Data Exfiltration: YesPersonally Identifiable Information: Employee data (phone numbers, job titles, names)
DECEMBER 2025
751Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
751Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
751Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
751Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
751Before Incident
JULY 2025
751Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Google Workspace ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Google Workspace's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Google Workspace ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Google Workspace's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?