Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Google LLC

Google LLC Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

googlellc.com

Google LLC is a global technology company that develops innovative internet-based products and services. Its offerings include online search, cloud computing, digital advertising, artificial intelligence, mobile operating systems, productivity tools, and video streaming platforms. The company aims to make information universally accessible and useful while helping individuals and businesses connect, create, and grow through technology.


Google LLC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Google LLC
Company Information
Website:https://www.googlellc.com
Employees number:3
Number of followers:12
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:googlellc.com
Google LLC Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
Google LLCTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
19/08/2026
736/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Google LLC Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Google LLCTechnology, Information and Internet
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Google LLC
Google LLCModerate
Current Score
736Ba (MODERATE)
01000
2 incidents
-27.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
755Before Incident
Cyber Attack
19 Aug 2026Google LLC
Anthropic, Google and Apple: Hackers Use Fake Claude Guide to Steal Mac Passwords and Hijack Crypto Wallet Apps

Fake Claude Installation Guides Used to Spread MacSync Malware on macOS

736After Incident
CRITICAL-19
GOOAPPANT1787128134
Fake Claude Installation Guides Used to Spread MacSync Malware on macOS Cybercriminals are leveraging fake installation guides for the AI assistant Claude to distribute MacSync, a sophisticated information stealer and remote access trojan (RAT) targeting Mac users. The campaign exploits sponsored Google search results and a publicly shared page on claude.ai, making the malicious links appear legitimate. ### How the Attack Unfolds A victim searching for "How to install Claude Code on a Mac" clicked a paid Google ad redirecting to a Claude-branded conversation disguised as "Apple Support." The page instructed users to paste a command into Terminal, which instead downloaded and executed malware. The attack relies on social engineering victims manually run the malicious command, which uses curl to fetch an obfuscated payload piped directly into Z shell (zsh). The first-stage loader is a Base64-encoded, gzip-compressed zsh script, with variations between victims to evade simple hash-based detection. ### Malware Capabilities & Data Theft Once executed, MacSync fetches AppleScript from attacker-controlled servers, running it in memory to avoid disk-based detection. The malware then requests Full Disk Access, a high-privilege macOS permission, and displays a fake system dialog to capture the user’s Mac account password validated via dscl to ensure accuracy. MacSync exfiltrates a wide range of sensitive data, including: - Browser cookies & saved logins - Keychain data & SSH keys - Cloud credentials & Telegram session data - Safari history & Apple Notes - Files from common user directories - Chromium "Safe Storage" keys (used to decrypt browser credentials) Stolen data is compressed into /tmp/osalogging.zip, uploaded to attacker infrastructure, and deleted from the victim’s system. ### Persistence & Remote Access The malware installs a Mach-O RAT via a LaunchAgent, enabling: - Remote shell access - Command execution - File transfer - Additional data theft A separate helper app attempts to gain Screen Recording permission, allowing the RAT to capture screenshots and transmit them to the attackers. ### Cryptocurrency Wallet Targeting MacSync also scans for dozens of cryptocurrency wallet browser extensions and desktop apps, including hardware-wallet companion software. It replaces legitimate wallet apps with trojanized versions, tricking users into entering seed phrases which, once stolen, grant attackers full control over wallets without requiring the original hardware. The campaign highlights the growing sophistication of macOS malware, combining social engineering, in-memory execution, and multi-stage payloads to evade detection while maximizing data theft.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Malware Distribution
MOTIVATION
Data Theft, Financial Gain, Remote Access
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Browser cookies, saved logins, Keychain data, SSH keys, Cloud credentials, Telegram session data, Safari history, Apple Notes, Chromium 'Safe Storage' keys, Cryptocurrency wallet seed phrasesSystems Affected: macOS systemsOperational Impact: Remote access to compromised systems, Data exfiltration, Potential financial theft via cryptocurrency walletsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to Claude and Apple due to misuse of brandingIdentity Theft Risk: High (due to stolen PII and credentials)Payment Information Risk: High (due to stolen browser credentials and cryptocurrency wallets)
DATA BREACH
Browser dataCredentialsCryptocurrency wallet informationPersonal notesSystem access tokensSensitivity Of Data: HighCookiesKeychain filesSSH keysBrowser credentialsCryptocurrency wallet files
AUGUST 2026
772Before Incident
Vulnerability
18 Aug 2026Google LLC
Google and Microsoft: Critical Microsoft Copilot CoSnitch Vulnerability Lets Attackers Steal Sensitive Data With One Click

Microsoft Patches Critical Copilot Vulnerability Allowing Silent Data Theft

736After Incident
CRITICAL-36
GOOMIC1787113515
Microsoft Patches Critical Copilot Vulnerability Allowing Silent Data Theft A critical flaw in Microsoft Copilot Personal, tracked as CVE-2026-24301 (CoSnitch), enabled attackers to exfiltrate sensitive data from connected accounts including Gmail, Google Drive, and Calendar with just a single click on a malicious link. Discovered by Varonis Threat Labs, the vulnerability was patched by Microsoft on August 18, 2026, though no evidence of active exploitation was found prior to the fix. CoSnitch exploited three interconnected weaknesses: 1. An undocumented URL parameter, combined with Copilot’s standard query function, allowed automatic execution of attacker-crafted prompts upon page load no user interaction required. 2. Once triggered, Copilot could query linked apps and funnel stolen data to an attacker-controlled server via its built-in URL-fetching feature, disguising the exfiltration as routine traffic. 3. A booby-trapped webpage could inject hidden instructions into Copilot’s persistent memory, surviving password resets, session revocations, and device re-enrollment rendering standard remediation ineffective. The discovery method itself was notable: Varonis researchers socially engineered Copilot’s reasoning by repeatedly questioning its security assumptions, prompting the AI to inadvertently reveal the exploit’s mechanics. This "meta-hacking" approach bypassed traditional code analysis, highlighting a new attack vector against AI systems. CoSnitch is the third Copilot vulnerability uncovered by Varonis in 2026, following Reprompt (which bypassed safety guardrails via repeated queries) and SearchLeak (which turned Copilot Enterprise into a covert exfiltration channel). All three exploits relied on single-click attacks, evading detection by mimicking legitimate assistant behavior. The incident underscores the risks of AI assistants with deep access to enterprise data, where a single compromised link can silently siphon large volumes of sensitive information. Security teams are advised to treat Copilot as a privileged insider, auditing connected apps and ensuring monitoring tools can detect anomalous AI-driven data access.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Exfiltration
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive data from connected accounts (Gmail, Google Drive, Calendar)Systems Affected: Microsoft Copilot PersonalOperational Impact: Potential silent data exfiltrationBrand Reputation Impact: Risk of reputational damage due to AI-driven data theftIdentity Theft Risk: High (personally identifiable information at risk)
DATA BREACH
EmailsCalendar entriesFiles from Google DriveSensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable information, sensitive business data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (via attacker-controlled server)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
JULY 2026
772Before Incident
JUNE 2026
772Before Incident
MAY 2026
772Before Incident
APRIL 2026
772Before Incident
MARCH 2026
772Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
772Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
772Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
772Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
772Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
772Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
772Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Google LLC ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Google LLC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Google LLC ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Google LLC's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?