Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Google PolskaGoogle Polska
VS
PedidosYaPedidosYa
Google Polska

Google Polska

Rondo Ignacego Daszyńskiego 2c, Wola, 00-833, PL

Last Update: 17/06/2026

View Profile
738/1000Moderate

Najnowsze wiadomości od Google prosto z Polski. Bądź na bieżąco z naszymi produktami, innowacjami i aktualnościami z życia firmy. Pytania prasowe prosimy kierować do naszego zespołu ds. komunikacji na adres [email protected].

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

La Cumparsita 1475, 11200 Montevideo, Departamento de Montevideo, Montevideo, Montevideo, UY, 11200

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
790/1000Fair

We’re  the delivery market leader in Latin America. Our platform connects over 77.000 restaurants, supermarkets, pharmacies and stores with millions of users. Nowadays we operate in more than 500 cities in Latinamerica. And we are now over 3.400 employees. PedidosYa is ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:13,651
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Google Polska

Google Polska

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Google Polska has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PedidosYa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Google Polska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google Polska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PedidosYa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PedidosYa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Google Polska

Google Polska

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
WIRGOO1781655885
PedidosYa

PedidosYa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Google Polska company and PedidosYa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Google Polska and PedidosYa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Google Polska and PedidosYa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Google Polska or PedidosYa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Google Polska or PedidosYa ?
Between Google Polska and PedidosYa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Google Polska and PedidosYa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA