Comparison Overview
Google Polska

Google Polska
Rondo Ignacego Daszyńskiego 2c, Wola, 00-833, PL
Last Update: 17/06/2026
Najnowsze wiadomości od Google prosto z Polski. Bądź na bieżąco z naszymi produktami, innowacjami i aktualnościami z życia firmy. Pytania prasowe prosimy kierować do naszego zespołu ds. komunikacji na adres [email protected].

Atlassian
Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, NSW, AU, 2000
Last Update: 22/04/2026
Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practice...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Google Polska







Atlassian






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Google Polska has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Atlassian has 183.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Google Polska (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Google Polska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Google Polska

Atlassian
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.