Comparison Overview
Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink
Christians Brygge 28, Copenhagen V, 1559, DK
Last Update: 30/03/2026
In 2013, we revolutionized email signature management by launching our cloud-based portal on Microsoft Azure. Before this, IT departments were burdened with on-premises administration. Our intuitive, browser-based platform with role-based access empowers marketing and...

ITC Infotech
No.18, Banaswadi Main Road, Maruthiseva Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560005
Last Update: 01/04/2026
ITC Infotech is a global technology solution and services leader providing business-friendly solutions, that enable future-readiness for clients. We seamlessly bring together digital expertise, strong industry-specific alliances, and deep domain expertise from ITC Group...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink







ITC Infotech






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ITC Infotech in 2026.
Incident History - Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ITC Infotech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ITC Infotech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

ITC Infotech
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Redis contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the 'tlsProcessPendingData()' function, which handles the TLS pending-data list if Redis is configured with TLS support. A remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the Redis server. Fixed in Redis 8.2.9, 8.4.6, 8.6.6, 8.8.2, and 8.10.1.
- https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/6d088c335d5c3ec49a6c28486140b498e70b7834
- https://github.com/v12-security/pocs/tree/main/redis/server_ssl
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.10/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.2/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.4/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.6/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redis/redis/8.8/00-RELEASENOTES
Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in the product photo upload in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.16.0 allows an authenticated user holding the create product permission (routine Seller role) to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the application origin. The photo validation rule classifies the file only by its content (magic bytes) and rejects only a fixed list of PHP extensions, while ProductSaveController::save() names the stored file using the client-supplied extension and copies it into the public web root. A file that begins with an image header and carries an HTML extension passes validation, is stored under public/asset/upload/product/, and is served with a text/html content type, turning the upload into first-party stored script execution.
A flaw was found in gdk-pixbuf. When loading a specially crafted JPEG image containing chunked ICC profile markers, an error during ICC profile parsing can leave stale size metadata after the profile buffer is freed. A subsequent allocation in the same decode can cause an out-of-bounds write, potentially crashing the application. To exploit this flaw, an application using gdk-pixbuf must process the malicious JPEG image. Affected version >= 2.26.4
A relative path traversal issue in the zip extraction functionality in AWS diagram-as-code (awsdac) in versions 0.10 through 0.23 can allow a third party to write arbitrary files to the local filesystem via crafted zip entry names containing path traversal sequences. This could allow the third party to perform inappropriate actions in the diagram bundle. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to the version 0.24 or later.
A weakness has been identified in RooCodeInc Roo-Code up to 3.51.1. Affected by this issue is the function ExecaTerminalProcess of the component README File Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Multiple isses were reported to the vendor beforehand. They explain, that "they all apply to Roo Code, a project we no longer support - the repository was archived a while ago, and we don't encourage anyone to use it." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.