Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by XinkEmail Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink
VS
HitachiHitachi
Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

Christians Brygge 28, Copenhagen V, 1559, DK

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

In 2013, we revolutionized email signature management by launching our cloud-based portal on Microsoft Azure. Before this, IT departments were burdened with on-premises administration. Our intuitive, browser-based platform with role-based access empowers marketing and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hitachi

Hitachi

1-6-6, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, JP, 100-8280

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.hitachi.com
827/1000Good

For over 100 years, Hitachi has been committed to developing innovations that improve lives. Today, this means creating superior technology and products that balance environment, well-being, and economic growth. We integrate IT, operational technology (OT), and produc...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:37,613
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hitachi

Hitachi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hitachi in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hitachi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hitachi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hitachi

Hitachi

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SIEMOXMITHIT1774866497

FAQ

Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink company and Hitachi company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink and Hitachi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink and Hitachi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink or Hitachi ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink or Hitachi ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink and Hitachi, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink and Hitachi, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA