Comparison Overview
Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink
Christians Brygge 28, Copenhagen V, 1559, DK
Last Update: 30/03/2026
In 2013, we revolutionized email signature management by launching our cloud-based portal on Microsoft Azure. Before this, IT departments were burdened with on-premises administration. Our intuitive, browser-based platform with role-based access empowers marketing and...

Coforge
Noida Expressway, Noida, 201304, IN
Last Update: 03/09/2026
Coforge is a global digital services and solutions provider that fuses deep domain expertise with emerging technologies to deliver real-world business impact. With a sharp focus on select industries and an execution intensity that’s uniquely our own, Coforge has emerge...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink







Coforge






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Coforge in 2026.
Incident History - Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Coforge (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Coforge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Email Signature Management for Google Workspace / Gmail / Google Directory | by Xink

Coforge
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 fails to properly validate variable names extracted from alog files in the SplitHandler, allowing attackers to write files outside the split directory. Attackers can supply crafted alog files with backslash sequences in variable names to escape the output directory and append to arbitrary files on Windows systems.
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/blob/1de9ae146cd63c209e8c3fd81611a4ed2472971b/ivp/src/lib_logutils/SplitHandler.cpp#L189
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/commit/6f0619e905b325d6b88f76425673045c6e4f6f94
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/pull/137
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-ivp-through-24.8.1-alog-splitting-path-traversal-on-windows
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer over-read vulnerability in CMOOSCommPkt where a four-byte packet triggers out-of-bounds memory access during deserialization. Attackers can open a TCP connection to the MOOSDB port and send a crafted short packet to read memory before authentication.
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/blob/ec9c77c68fcbdef8f5e4c60fe243acd223433f0c/Core/libMOOS/Comms/MOOSCommPkt.cpp#L228
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/commit/d30c14585753f9ae39749d9628ed15c8383f0568
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/pull/75
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-core-moos-through-10.4.0-moosdb-out-of-bounds-read-via-short-packet
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in CMOOSSerialPort::GetTelegram() that writes a NUL terminator one byte past the serial telegram stack buffer. Attackers controlling the serial line can send a full-length telegram to trigger the off-by-one write, corrupting the stack and potentially enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/blob/ec9c77c68fcbdef8f5e4c60fe243acd223433f0c/Core/libMOOS/Utils/MOOSSerialPort.cpp#L595
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/commit/befb04df2039d0080715ea35f56268092db4ec0f
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/pull/73
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-core-moos-through-10.4.0-off-by-one-buffer-overflow-in-serial-telegram-handling
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 fails to escape database contents when rendering MOOSDB HTTP pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts. Any MOOS publisher can set variable values containing script payloads that execute in the browser of operators viewing the web interface.
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/blob/ec9c77c68fcbdef8f5e4c60fe243acd223433f0c/Core/libMOOS/DB/HTTPConnection.cpp#L460
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/commit/a3f26f099bb08decb143f704d8b1ca16ae405b44
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/pull/78
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-core-moos-through-10.4.0-moosdb-http-pages-stored-cross-site-scripting
MOOS ui-moos through 50b9c6c contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in ScopeTabPane.cpp and ScopeGrid.cpp where client and variable names are formatted into fixed 1024-byte buffers using sprintf without length validation. Attackers can supply arbitrarily long MOOS identifiers that overflow the buffers when an operator selects process list entries or pokes variables, enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos/blob/50b9c6c65169c501f746cfef1e167f74a7735e74/Tools/Graphical/uMS/ScopeTabPane.cpp#L243
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos/commit/a6ebc0bc6cb360315ce620e865f996d189cddb0e
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos/pull/5
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-ui-moos-through-50b9c6c-ums-buffer-overflow-via-long-moos-identifiers