Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Google for PublishersGoogle for Publishers
VS
Akamai TechnologiesAkamai Technologies
Google for Publishers

Google for Publishers

N/A

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
795/1000Fair

Empowering publishers, content creators and developers with the tools to unlock their ad revenue potential. Google for Publishers is a place to connect, learn, and grow with Google's monetization solutions. Get the latest news, tips, and resources for Google AdMob, Goog...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:46
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

8 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, 02142, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.akamai.com
740/1000Moderate

At Akamai, we make life better for billions of people, billions of times a day. Every day, billions of people around the world connect with their favorite brands to shop online, play the latest video games, log into mobile banking apps, learn remotely, share videos wi...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,673
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Google for Publishers

Google for Publishers

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Google for Publishers in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Akamai Technologies has 197.03% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Google for Publishers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google for Publishers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Akamai Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akamai Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Google for Publishers

Google for Publishers

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Akamai Technologies

Akamai Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TOLTELAKA1777389934
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AKA1776515140
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MARAKA1789468190

FAQ

Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Google for Publishers company and Akamai Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Google for Publishers and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Google for Publishers and Akamai Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Google for Publishers or Akamai Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Google for Publishers or Akamai Technologies ?
Between Google for Publishers and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Google for Publishers and Akamai Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9