Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Google Developer

Google Developer Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

guden.uk

Guden's Google Software Development Services is a team of experienced engineers and architects who can help you build, deploy, and manage your software solutions at scale. We offer a wide range of services, including: Software architecture and design: We can help you design a software architecture that is scalable, secure, and reliable. We also have experience with a variety of cloud platforms, so we can help you choose the right platform for your needs. Software development: We can develop your software solution from scratch, or we can work with your existing team to enhance your existing codebase. We have experience with a wide range of programming languages and technologies. Software deployment and management: We can help you deploy


Google Developer A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Google Developer
Company Information
Website:http://guden.uk
Employees number:87
Number of followers:0
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:guden.uk
Google Developer Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 800 and 849
logo
Google DeveloperSoftware Development
Updated:
15/04/2026
819/1000
Good
A
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Google Developer Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Google DeveloperSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Google Developer
Google DeveloperGood
Current Score
819A (GOOD)
01000
1 incidents
-1 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
819Before Incident
MAY 2026
819Before Incident
APRIL 2026
819Before Incident
MARCH 2026
819Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
819Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
819Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
819Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
818Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
819Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Oct 2025Google Developer
GitHub, Anthropic and Google: Anthropic, Google, Microsoft paid AI bug bounties – quietly

Security Researchers Hijack AI Agents in GitHub Actions via Prompt Injection, Steal API Keys

818After Incident
CRITICAL-1
ANTGITGOO1776249351
Security Researchers Hijack AI Agents in GitHub Actions via Prompt Injection, Steal API Keys Security researchers from Johns Hopkins University, led by Aonan Guan, successfully hijacked three major AI agents integrated with GitHub Actions Anthropic’s Claude Code Security Review, Google’s Gemini CLI Action, and Microsoft’s GitHub Copilot using a novel prompt injection attack to steal API keys and access tokens. Despite receiving bug bounties from all three vendors, none issued public advisories or assigned CVEs, leaving users potentially exposed. ### The Attack: "Comment-and-Control" Prompt Injection The researchers exploited a flaw in how AI agents process GitHub data including pull request titles, issue bodies, and comments by injecting malicious instructions. Unlike traditional indirect prompt injection, which relies on a victim manually triggering the AI (e.g., "summarize this file"), this "comment-and-control" method is proactive: simply opening a PR or filing an issue can automatically execute the attack without user interaction. - Anthropic’s Claude: Guan demonstrated that a malicious PR title could force the agent to execute arbitrary commands (e.g., `whoami`) and leak credentials in its JSON response. After reporting the flaw in October, Anthropic updated its documentation to warn users but did not issue a public advisory. - Google’s Gemini: Researchers tricked the agent into exposing its API key by injecting a fake "trusted content section" in an issue comment. Google awarded a $1,337 bounty but did not disclose the vulnerability. - Microsoft’s GitHub Copilot: The most fortified target, Copilot includes runtime defenses (environment filtering, secret scanning, and a network firewall). Guan bypassed these by hiding malicious instructions in an HTML comment invisible to human reviewers but processed by the AI. Microsoft initially dismissed the report as a "known issue" before awarding a $500 bounty in March. ### Impact and Risks The attacks could compromise: - API keys (Anthropic, Gemini) - GitHub access tokens - Repository or organization secrets exposed in GitHub Actions environments Guan warned that the technique likely works on other AI agents integrated with GitHub, including Slack bots, Jira agents, and deployment automation tools. Despite fixes, users pinned to vulnerable versions may remain unaware of the risk. ### Vendor Responses - Anthropic: Updated documentation to warn against untrusted PRs and recommended requiring maintainer approval for external contributions. - Google & Microsoft: Acknowledged the flaws via bug bounties but did not issue public disclosures. - GitHub: Initially unable to reproduce the Copilot exploit but later confirmed it. The research underscores the need for least-privilege access controls in AI agents, treating them like "super-powered employees" with only the necessary permissions to perform their tasks.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Prompt Injection Attack
MOTIVATION
Security research and vulnerability disclosure
IMPACT
Data Compromised: API keys, GitHub access tokens, repository/organization secretsSystems Affected: AI agents integrated with GitHub Actions (Anthropic’s Claude, Google’s Gemini, Microsoft’s GitHub Copilot)Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to repositories and sensitive dataBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to vendors due to undisclosed vulnerabilities
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: API keys, access tokens, repository secretsSensitivity Of Data: High (credentials, secrets)Data Exfiltration: Potential exfiltration of stolen credentials
SEPTEMBER 2025
819Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
819Before Incident
JULY 2025
819Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Google Developer ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Google Developer's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Google Developer ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Google Developer's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?