Comparison Overview
Goldman Sachs
Goldman Sachs
200 West Street, New York, 10282, US
Last Update: 12/10/2026
We aspire to be the world’s most exceptional financial institution, united by our shared values of partnership, client service, integrity, and excellence. Operating at the center of capital markets, we act as one firm, mobilizing our people, capital, and ideas to deli...
Revolut
30 S Colonnade, London, E14 5HX, GB
Last Update: 28/09/2026
People deserve more from their money. More visibility, more control, and more freedom. Since 2015, Revolut has been on a mission to deliver just that. Our powerhouse of products help our 70+ million customers get more from their money every day. As we continue our ligh...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Goldman Sachs
Revolut
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Goldman Sachs has 128.57% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Revolut has 1076.47% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Goldman Sachs (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Goldman Sachs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Revolut (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Revolut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Goldman Sachs
Revolut
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.