Comparison Overview

Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus

VS

Dancing in the Streets

Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus

717 Hampshire St, None, San Francisco, California, US, 94110
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

The Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus is entering its third decade of presenting high quality musical performances and dynamic music education programs to communities in the San Francisco Bay area. The Golden Gate Symphony provides access to classical music at the community level through implementing live music programs through an innovative ensemble orchestra and choral group, and presents works ranging from classical to contemporary compositions.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dancing in the Streets

2825 3rd Ave, Bronx , New York, 10455, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Dancing in the Streets, based in the South Bronx, develops movement-based projects through long term initiatives, integrating rigorous inquiry, artistic exploration, deep community engagement, and the nurturing of urban artists. Our three main areas of activity: Resident Artists - based in communities, to nurture individual creativity, and build bridges across generations, communities, and cultures. The Incubator - supporting and developing new generations of artists in dance and social practice. It's Showtime NYC! - nurturing emerging urban dance artists, and advocating the value, and importance of Hip Hop culture in NYC, nationally and internationally. Founded in 1984, Dancing in the Streets has produced and presented over 500 free public performances by over 300 contemporary artists, including site-specific productions at spectacular urban sites by Meredith Monk, Ann Carlson, Douglas Dunn, Eiko & Koma, Joanna Haigood, Steve Koplowitz, Tere O’Connor, Elizabeth Streb, Reggie Wilson, and Yasuko Yakoshi. In its early years, Dancing in the Streets fostered site-specific work as a public art form across New York City, the U.S. and internationally. Since 2001, Dancing in the Streets has been an urban pioneer, producing dance performances in unknown sites throughout the NYC metropolitan area, including the massive Port Authority Grain Terminal in Red Hook, the Tobacco Warehouse in Brooklyn Bridge Park, Fort Jay on Governor’s Island, Hangar B at Brooklyn’s Floyd Bennett Field, and in the streets of the South Bronx.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/golden-gate-symphony.jpeg
Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancing-in-the-streets.jpeg
Dancing in the Streets
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dancing in the Streets
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dancing in the Streets in 2025.

Incident History — Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dancing in the Streets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dancing in the Streets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/golden-gate-symphony.jpeg
Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancing-in-the-streets.jpeg
Dancing in the Streets
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dancing in the Streets company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dancing in the Streets company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus company.

In the current year, Dancing in the Streets company and Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus company nor Dancing in the Streets company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus nor Dancing in the Streets holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus company nor Dancing in the Streets company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dancing in the Streets company employs more people globally than Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus nor Dancing in the Streets holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus nor Dancing in the Streets holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus nor Dancing in the Streets holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus nor Dancing in the Streets holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus nor Dancing in the Streets holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Golden Gate Symphony Orchestra & Chorus nor Dancing in the Streets holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H