Comparison Overview

Golden Entertainment, Inc.

VS

WinnaVegas Casino Resort

Golden Entertainment, Inc.

None, None, None, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

Golden Entertainment owns and operates a diversified entertainment platform, consisting of a portfolio of gaming and hospitality assets that focus on casino and branded tavern operations. Golden Entertainment owns eight casinos and 71 gaming taverns in Nevada, operating over 5,500 slots, nearly 100 table games, and over 6,000 hotel rooms. For more information, visit www.goldenent.com.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 919
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

WinnaVegas Casino Resort

1500 330th Street, Sloan, 51055, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

WinnaVegas is Siouxland's number one destination for fun and excitement! 27 years and still going strong! Win big at over 750 slot and video poker machines. Try your luck at one of the live poker, Blackjack, and Craps tables. Get ready to yell, "BINGO!"​ because WinnaVegas is the best place around for some lively Bingo. WinnaVegas has great live entertainment in the Event Center and Lounge Bar. No gambling on an empty stomach with the tasty all-you-can-eat buffet. If all that isn't enough, signup or play to win one of many life-changing cash giveaways.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 130
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/golden-ent.jpeg
Golden Entertainment, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winnavegas-casino-resort.jpeg
WinnaVegas Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Golden Entertainment, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WinnaVegas Casino Resort
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Golden Entertainment, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WinnaVegas Casino Resort in 2025.

Incident History — Golden Entertainment, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Golden Entertainment, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WinnaVegas Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WinnaVegas Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/golden-ent.jpeg
Golden Entertainment, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Email Accounts
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/winnavegas-casino-resort.jpeg
WinnaVegas Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

WinnaVegas Casino Resort company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Golden Entertainment, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Golden Entertainment, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas WinnaVegas Casino Resort company has not reported any.

In the current year, WinnaVegas Casino Resort company and Golden Entertainment, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WinnaVegas Casino Resort company nor Golden Entertainment, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Golden Entertainment, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other WinnaVegas Casino Resort company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither WinnaVegas Casino Resort company nor Golden Entertainment, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Golden Entertainment, Inc. company nor WinnaVegas Casino Resort company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Golden Entertainment, Inc. nor WinnaVegas Casino Resort holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Golden Entertainment, Inc. company nor WinnaVegas Casino Resort company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Golden Entertainment, Inc. company employs more people globally than WinnaVegas Casino Resort company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Golden Entertainment, Inc. nor WinnaVegas Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Golden Entertainment, Inc. nor WinnaVegas Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Golden Entertainment, Inc. nor WinnaVegas Casino Resort holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Golden Entertainment, Inc. nor WinnaVegas Casino Resort holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Golden Entertainment, Inc. nor WinnaVegas Casino Resort holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Golden Entertainment, Inc. nor WinnaVegas Casino Resort holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H