Comparison Overview
Golden Corral Franchising

Golden Corral Franchising
5400 Trinity Road, Suite 309, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, US
Last Update: 01/12/2025
We support the Golden Corral Franchise Community with news and information on the topics of franchising, business, investing, restaurant marketing and management. Follow us and learn how to become a Golden Corral Franchisee! #DreamBig

Papa Johns
788 Circle 75 Pkwy SE, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30339
Last Update: 17/09/2026
Papa Johns seeks people who have an entrepreneurial spirit and share our philosophy for success. Hands-on training, a clean and safe work environment, quality business practices, advancement opportunities and meaningful work combine to produce not only the best pizza, b...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Golden Corral Franchising







Papa Johns






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Golden Corral Franchising in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Papa Johns in 2026.
Incident History - Golden Corral Franchising (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Golden Corral Franchising cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Papa Johns (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Papa Johns cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Golden Corral Franchising

Papa Johns
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.