Comparison Overview

GOLD FIELDS

VS

JSW Steel

GOLD FIELDS

150 Helen Road, Sandton, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2196, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Be part of a leading global gold mining with an inspiring Purpose: To create enduring value beyond mining in the lives and places our company touches. You’ll find our nine operations in Australia, Chile, Ghana, Peru, and South Africa. We have also started a project in Canada. Gold Fields is listed on both the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Our 23,000+ people (including those from business partners) may be based across the world, but we are united by knowing that we are #StrongerTogether. This is at the heart of how we do things – we call it the Gold Fields Way. It is all about being one inclusive team – caring, connected and courageous – delivering great impact together. Visit our jobs section to see how you can join us.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 8,438
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JSW Steel

Bandra Kurla Complex,, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 051
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Over the last 35 years, we have partnered the country in its journey to self-reliance, by embracing sustainability, adopting cutting-edge technology and having innovation and R&D initiatives at the heart of our culture. From humble beginnings with a single plant in 1982, we are now India's leading manufacturer of value-added and high-end steels. Our plants in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra have a total capacity of 29.7 MTPA, and we are scaling up existing plants and opening new ones to take that figure to 40 MTPA. Globally, we own a plate and pipe mill in the US, and mining assets in the US, Chile and Mozambique. But we're not ones to rest on our laurels. Driven by decades of experience and a dynamic culture, we constantly seek new ways to revolutionize steelmaking. To begin with, we integrate sustainability into everything we do. We benchmark our business vision and governance systems, manufacturing and sales processes, and even our customer and community engagement initiatives, against global best-in-class standards. We bolster these sustainability initiatives, by staying on the cutting edge of technology. It's a strategy that has helped us create the largest product portfolio in India, and at the same time, become India's largest exporter of steel with a presence in more than 100 countries. Today, nearly 40% of our products are high-value steels, a figure we intend to take up to 50% soon. We’ve made this technological prowess possible with a relentless focus on innovation and R&D. It has helped us stay ahead of competition, customise our offerings as per client requirements, partner with global leaders such as JFE Steel, Marubeni Itochu Steel, Praxair and Severfield Rowen Plc. to be cost-efficient, and be seen worldwide as a purveyor of high-end, value-added steel.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 20,930
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold-fields.jpeg
GOLD FIELDS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jswsteel.jpeg
JSW Steel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GOLD FIELDS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JSW Steel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GOLD FIELDS in 2025.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JSW Steel in 2025.

Incident History — GOLD FIELDS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GOLD FIELDS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JSW Steel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JSW Steel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gold-fields.jpeg
GOLD FIELDS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jswsteel.jpeg
JSW Steel
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

GOLD FIELDS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JSW Steel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

JSW Steel company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GOLD FIELDS company has not reported any.

In the current year, JSW Steel company and GOLD FIELDS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

JSW Steel company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while GOLD FIELDS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither JSW Steel company nor GOLD FIELDS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JSW Steel company nor GOLD FIELDS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GOLD FIELDS company nor JSW Steel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GOLD FIELDS nor JSW Steel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

JSW Steel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GOLD FIELDS company.

JSW Steel company employs more people globally than GOLD FIELDS company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither GOLD FIELDS nor JSW Steel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GOLD FIELDS nor JSW Steel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GOLD FIELDS nor JSW Steel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GOLD FIELDS nor JSW Steel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GOLD FIELDS nor JSW Steel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GOLD FIELDS nor JSW Steel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H