Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GogoGogo
VS
TELUSTELUS
Gogo

Gogo

111 N Canal Street, Suite 1500, Chicago, IL, 60606, US

Last Update: 10/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gogoair.com
753/1000Fair

Gogo is the Inflight Internet Company. We are the leading global provider of broadband connectivity products and services for aviation. We design and source innovative network solutions that connect aircraft to the Internet, and develop software and platforms that enab...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:923
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TELUS

TELUS

510 West Georgia St., Vancouver, V6B 0M3, CA

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.telus.com
199/1000Critical

At TELUS, our purpose-driven team works together every day to innovate and do good. From providing technology solutions that make our lives safer and easier, to supporting those who need it most, our inclusive, spirited and giving people are passionate about empowering ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:38,811
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gogo

Gogo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TELUS

TELUS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gogo in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

TELUS has 494.06% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Gogo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gogo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TELUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TELUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gogo

Gogo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TELUS

TELUS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TEL1789172982
🔒 Incident : Breach
LOBTEL1776782580
🔒 Incident : Breach
NO-SHOPRELOB1773534483

FAQ

Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gogo company and TELUS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gogo and TELUS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gogo and TELUS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gogo or TELUS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gogo or TELUS ?
Between Gogo and TELUS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gogo and TELUS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA