Comparison Overview

Godrej Enterprises Group

VS

Alpargatas S.A.

Godrej Enterprises Group

None
Last Update: 2025-12-27

Since 1897, Godrej Enterprises Group (which includes Godrej & Boyce and its affiliates) has contributed significantly to India’s economic growth and self-reliance by providing complex engineering, design led innovation, and sustainable manufacturing solutions. From the world’s first patented springless lock, and safes to pioneering Indian made typewriters and refrigerators, the conglomerate has also paved the way for the growth of key sectors like aerospace, energy, and security. Today, Godrej Enterprises Group, has presence across 5 continents with a market-leading presence across diverse consumer and industrial businesses spanning Aerospace, Aviation, Defence, Energy, Locks & Security Solutions, Green Building Consulting, Construction and EPC Services, Intralogistics, Tooling, Healthcare Equipment, Consumer Durables, Furniture, Architectural Fittings, IT Solutions and Vending Machines. At Godrej Enterprises, we enable you to do work that’s good for you, your customers, your community and good for the people around you - essentially, work that you can be proud of.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 19,482
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alpargatas S.A.

Av. das Nações Unidas, 14.261, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 04794-000
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

We are a global company, founded and based in Brazil for over 115 years. We are committed to delight the world with amazing brands, that convey lightness and joy to the everyday lives of our consumers. We own Havaianas brand, world leader in open shoes, known for the iconic flip-flops that represent Brazilianness, comfort and style. We have 49.2% of Rothy’s a north-american sustainable footwear Brand. The Havaianas brand is one of the largest open-toe footwear brands in the world, with a significant presence and operation in dozens of countries. Rothy’s is present in the United States. Our growth is based on sustainability and economy, always valuing the socio-environmental responsibility of our operations. Our supply chain is vertical, with four manufacturing units in Brazil, and we own ioasys, our digital transformation company. We are more than 10 thousand employees, passionate about make it happen, who want to inspire the world to walk a lighter path. #WeAreAlpaLovers – Inspired by consumers and we walk together to make it happen!

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,977
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/godrej-enterprises-group.jpeg
Godrej Enterprises Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpargatas.jpeg
Alpargatas S.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Godrej Enterprises Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alpargatas S.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Godrej Enterprises Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alpargatas S.A. in 2025.

Incident History — Godrej Enterprises Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Godrej Enterprises Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alpargatas S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpargatas S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/godrej-enterprises-group.jpeg
Godrej Enterprises Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpargatas.jpeg
Alpargatas S.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alpargatas S.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Godrej Enterprises Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alpargatas S.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Godrej Enterprises Group company.

In the current year, Alpargatas S.A. company and Godrej Enterprises Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. company nor Godrej Enterprises Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. company nor Godrej Enterprises Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. company nor Godrej Enterprises Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Godrej Enterprises Group company nor Alpargatas S.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Godrej Enterprises Group nor Alpargatas S.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Alpargatas S.A. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Godrej Enterprises Group company.

Godrej Enterprises Group company employs more people globally than Alpargatas S.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Godrej Enterprises Group nor Alpargatas S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Godrej Enterprises Group nor Alpargatas S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Godrej Enterprises Group nor Alpargatas S.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Godrej Enterprises Group nor Alpargatas S.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Godrej Enterprises Group nor Alpargatas S.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Godrej Enterprises Group nor Alpargatas S.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in qs (parse modules) allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects qs: < 6.14.1. SummaryThe arrayLimit option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using arrayLimit for DoS protection are vulnerable. DetailsThe arrayLimit option only checks limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2). Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js:159-162): if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) { obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check } Working code (lib/parse.js:175): else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here obj = []; obj[index] = leaf; } The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf) without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimit before creating arrays. PoCTest 1 - Basic bypass: npm install qs const qs = require('qs'); const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 6 (should be max 5) Test 2 - DoS demonstration: const qs = require('qs'); const attack = 'a[]=' + Array(10000).fill('x').join('&a[]='); const result = qs.parse(attack, { arrayLimit: 100 }); console.log(result.a.length); // Output: 10000 (should be max 100) Configuration: * arrayLimit: 5 (test 1) or arrayLimit: 100 (test 2) * Use bracket notation: a[]=value (not indexed a[0]=value) ImpactDenial of Service via memory exhaustion. Affects applications using qs.parse() with user-controlled input and arrayLimit for protection. Attack scenario: * Attacker sends HTTP request: GET /api/search?filters[]=x&filters[]=x&...&filters[]=x (100,000+ times) * Application parses with qs.parse(query, { arrayLimit: 100 }) * qs ignores limit, parses all 100,000 elements into array * Server memory exhausted → application crashes or becomes unresponsive * Service unavailable for all users Real-world impact: * Single malicious request can crash server * No authentication required * Easy to automate and scale * Affects any endpoint parsing query strings with bracket notation

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /home/editfood.php. This manipulation of the argument a/b/c/d causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /home/editrefugee.php. The manipulation of the argument rfid results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Mobile Builder Mobile builder allows Authentication Abuse.This issue affects Mobile builder: from n/a through 1.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Hiroaki Miyashita Custom Field Template allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Custom Field Template: from n/a through 2.7.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L