Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GoDaddy AustraliaGoDaddy Australia
VS
foodpandafoodpanda
GoDaddy Australia

GoDaddy Australia

Sydney, AU

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://au.godaddy.com
768/1000Fair

At GoDaddy Australia, we empower everyday entrepreneurs with all the help and tools you need to grow online. Whether it’s finding the right domain name, building a stunning website or setting up your professional email, we’ve got the tools for you. No tech knowledge r...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
foodpanda

foodpanda

63 Robinson Road, Singapore, 068894, SG

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://careers.foodpanda.com
805/1000Good

At foodpanda, we're on a mission to redefine how food, people, culture and tech are connected. Our panda family consists of problem solvers, designers and thinkers, working around the clock to make foodpanda the most powerful online tool for food convenience in the univ...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:17,790
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GoDaddy Australia

GoDaddy Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
foodpanda

foodpanda

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoDaddy Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for foodpanda in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GoDaddy Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoDaddy Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - foodpanda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

foodpanda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GoDaddy Australia

GoDaddy Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
foodpanda

foodpanda

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GoDaddy Australia company and foodpanda company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GoDaddy Australia and foodpanda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GoDaddy Australia and foodpanda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GoDaddy Australia or foodpanda ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GoDaddy Australia or foodpanda ?
Between GoDaddy Australia and foodpanda, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GoDaddy Australia and foodpanda, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2