Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GoCorp by GojekGoCorp by Gojek
VS
CiscoCisco
GoCorp by Gojek

GoCorp by Gojek

Jakarta, ID

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gojek.com/gocorp
753/1000Fair

GoCorp hadir sebagai solusi B2B dari Gojek yang memungkinkan perusahaan untuk memenuhi segala kebutuhan operasional bisnis sehari-hari melalui layanan Gojek dan juga membantu perusahaan mencapai efisiensi melalu dasbor real-time yang mampu mengonsolidasikan pelaporan ke...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:228
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cisco

Cisco

Tasman Way, San Jose, 95134, US

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.cisco.com
187/1000Critical

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its custo...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:95,930
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
24
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GoCorp by Gojek

GoCorp by Gojek

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cisco

Cisco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoCorp by Gojek in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Cisco has 2142.99% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - GoCorp by Gojek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoCorp by Gojek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GoCorp by Gojek

GoCorp by Gojek

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cisco

Cisco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1781792750
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1780568638
🔒 Incident : Breach
CISTHE1780591442

FAQ

Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek company and Cisco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GoCorp by Gojek or Cisco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GoCorp by Gojek or Cisco ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek and Cisco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GoCorp by Gojek and Cisco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA