Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gobierno del PerúGobierno del Perú
VS
Social Security AdministrationSocial Security Administration
Gobierno del Perú

Gobierno del Perú

Lima, PE

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.gob.pe/
652/1000Weak

Bienvenidos a la cuenta oficial de Gobierno del Perú. Aquí podrás encontrar información de las acciones del Gobierno sobre políticas públicas, gestión, crecimiento económico, prevención de desastre y mucho más. Además, conocer los diversos servicios que el Estado tiene ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:100
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Social Security Administration

Social Security Administration

6401 Security Blvd, Baltimore, 21235, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
474/1000Critical

Social Security provides financial protection for our nation’s people, supporting more than 64 million individuals and families. With retirement, disability, and survivors benefits, Social Security is one of the most successful anti-poverty programs in our nation's his...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:46,616
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gobierno del Perú

Gobierno del Perú

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Social Security Administration

Social Security Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gobierno del Perú in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Social Security Administration has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Gobierno del Perú (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gobierno del Perú cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Social Security Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Social Security Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gobierno del Perú

Gobierno del Perú

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GOB1771986629
Social Security Administration

Social Security Administration

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SSA1770710407
🔒 Incident : Breach
SSA5102551100825
🔒 Incident : Breach
SSA1773182549

FAQ

Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and Social Security Administration company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gobierno del Perú and Social Security Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gobierno del Perú and Social Security Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gobierno del Perú or Social Security Administration ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gobierno del Perú or Social Security Administration ?
Between Gobierno del Perú and Social Security Administration, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gobierno del Perú and Social Security Administration, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA