Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Gobierno del PerúGobierno del Perú
VS
I WORK FOR SAI WORK FOR SA
Gobierno del Perú

Gobierno del Perú

Lima, PE

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.gob.pe/
652/1000Weak

Bienvenidos a la cuenta oficial de Gobierno del Perú. Aquí podrás encontrar información de las acciones del Gobierno sobre políticas públicas, gestión, crecimiento económico, prevención de desastre y mucho más. Además, conocer los diversos servicios que el Estado tiene ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:100
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
I WORK FOR SA

I WORK FOR SA

200, Victoria Square / Tarndanyangga, Adelaide, 5000, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://iworkfor.sa.gov.au
779/1000Fair

The OFFICIAL careers page for the South Australian Government. The South Australian Public Sector is the State's largest workforce. We are an employer of choice that reflects the diverse community we serve. Our people are from a range of backgrounds and vocations, fro...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:19,039
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Gobierno del Perú

Gobierno del Perú

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
I WORK FOR SA

I WORK FOR SA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gobierno del Perú in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for I WORK FOR SA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Gobierno del Perú (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gobierno del Perú cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - I WORK FOR SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

I WORK FOR SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Gobierno del Perú

Gobierno del Perú

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GOB1771986629
I WORK FOR SA

I WORK FOR SA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Gobierno del Perú company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Gobierno del Perú and I WORK FOR SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Gobierno del Perú and I WORK FOR SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Gobierno del Perú or I WORK FOR SA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Gobierno del Perú or I WORK FOR SA ?
Between Gobierno del Perú and I WORK FOR SA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Gobierno del Perú and I WORK FOR SA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3