Comparison Overview

GO FIRST

VS

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

GO FIRST

1st Floor, C-1, Wadia International Centre,, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400025, IN
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Youโ€™ve landed on the official Go First's Company page.ย The airline where you come first!ย  Go First is the aviation foray of the Wadia Group. Currently, we have 54 aircraft and fly to 28 domestic destinations and 10 international destinations with over 220+ daily flights.ย  We see ourselves as a modern, futuristic organisation. Since our entry into the aviation industry, we have slowly expanded our footprint and now we are gearing up for our next level of expansion. We are here, on LinkedIn, to connect with you, shareย smart flyingย stories and be a part of your daily life. Please join us in this journey. We encourageย smartย ideas and friendly conversations on this platform, for an active engagement with you. Do check in with us as weโ€™d love to hear from you.ย  For any query, you may also connect with our social media team onย [email protected] Customer Care Number +91 22 68968300 Toll-Free Number 1800 2100 999

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 2,489
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Amsterdamseweg 55, None, Amstelveen, None, NL, 1182 GP
Last Update: 2025-08-09 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Welcome to our LinkedIn page! To learn how we can assist you, please check: http://klmf.ly/ContactCentre. KLM was founded in 1919 and is the oldest airline in the world. With a vast network of European and intercontinental destinations, KLM can offer direct flights to major cities and economic centres all over the world. Through our LinkedIn account, we make sure you are kept up-to-date about KLM and other developments in the air transport industry.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 22,391
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goair.jpeg
GO FIRST
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klm.jpeg
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
GO FIRST
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GO FIRST in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines has 85.19% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” GO FIRST (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GO FIRST cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goair.jpeg
GO FIRST
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klm.jpeg
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: AI-Amplified Social Engineering, Third-Party Customer Service Platform Exploitation, Voice Cloning, Deepfake Impersonation
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Monetization, Identity Theft, Loyalty Program Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both GO FIRST company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GO FIRST company has not reported any.

In the current year, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has reported more cyber incidents than GO FIRST company.

Neither KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company nor GO FIRST company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while GO FIRST company has not reported such incidents publicly.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while GO FIRST company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GO FIRST company nor KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GO FIRST company.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company employs more people globally than GO FIRST company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

pwn.college DOJO is an education platform for learning cybersecurity. In versions up to and including commit 781d91157cfc234a434d0bab45cbcf97894c642e, the /workspace endpoint contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows an attacker to access any active Windows VM without proper authorization. The vulnerability occurs in the view_desktop function where the user is retrieved via a URL parameter without verifying that the requester has administrative privileges. An attacker can supply any user ID and arbitrary password in the request parameters to impersonate another user. When requesting a Windows desktop service, the function does not validate the supplied password before generating access credentials, allowing the attacker to obtain an iframe source URL that grants full access to the target user's Windows VM. This impacts all users with active Windows VMs, as an attacker can access and modify data on the Windows machine and in the home directory of the associated Linux machine via the Z: drive. This issue has been patched in commit 467db0b9ea0d9a929dc89b41f6eb59f7cfc68bef. No known workarounds exist.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Connect versions 12.9 and earlier are affected by a URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to redirect users to malicious websites. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a crafted link.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N