Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GNU ProjectGNU Project
VS
MeituanMeituan
GNU Project

GNU Project

N/A

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.gnu.org/
814/1000Good

The GNU Project was launched in 1984 to develop a complete Unix-like operating system which is free software - software which respects your freedom. "Free software" is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of "free" as in "free s...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:74
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Meituan

Meituan

Wangjing International R&D Park, No.6 Wangjing East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, CN, 100102

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

Adhering to the ‘Retail + Technology’ strategy, Meituan commits to its mission that 'We help people eat better, live better'. Since its establishment in March 2010, Meituan has advanced the digital upgrading of services and goods retail on both supply and demand sides....

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:41,542
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GNU Project

GNU Project

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Meituan

Meituan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

GNU Project has 90.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meituan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GNU Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GNU Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Meituan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meituan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GNU Project

GNU Project

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GNU1773836738
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GNU1769439621
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GNU1769023602
Meituan

Meituan

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MEI231827722

FAQ

Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GNU Project company and Meituan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GNU Project and Meituan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GNU Project and Meituan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GNU Project or Meituan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GNU Project or Meituan ?
Between GNU Project and Meituan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GNU Project and Meituan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9