Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

The GNOME Foundation will work to further the goal of the GNOME project: to create a computing platform for use by the general public that is completely free software. The GNOME project provides two things: The GNOME desktop environment, an intuitive and attractive desktop for users, and the GNOME development platform, an extensive framework for building applications that integrate into the rest of the desktop.

GNOME Foundation A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

GNOME Foundation

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

gnome-foundation

Employees number:

107

Number of followers:

22,028

NAICS:

5112

Industry Type:

Software Development

Homepage:

gnome.org

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

GNO_2849719

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreGNOME Foundation Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gnome-foundation.jpeg
GNOME Foundation Software Development
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreGNOME Foundation Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gnome-foundation.jpeg
GNOME Foundation Software Development
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

GNOME Foundation Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
GNOME FoundationVulnerability2515/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences

Description: A severe security vulnerability affecting GNOME Remote Desktop has been discovered, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust system resources and crash critical processes. This vulnerability, classified under CWE-400, has a CVSS score of 7.4 and affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux environments, Debian, and Ubuntu systems. The attack can lead to persistent denial-of-service via resource exhaustion, disrupting remote desktop operations.

GNOME
Vulnerability
Severity: 25
Impact: 1
Seen: 5/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences

Description: A severe security vulnerability affecting GNOME Remote Desktop has been discovered, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust system resources and crash critical processes. This vulnerability, classified under CWE-400, has a CVSS score of 7.4 and affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux environments, Debian, and Ubuntu systems. The attack can lead to persistent denial-of-service via resource exhaustion, disrupting remote desktop operations.

Ailogo

GNOME Foundation Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for GNOME Foundation

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GNOME Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GNOME Foundation in 2026.

Incident Types GNOME Foundation vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GNOME Foundation in 2026.

Incident History — GNOME Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GNOME Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

GNOME Foundation Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

The GNOME Foundation will work to further the goal of the GNOME project: to create a computing platform for use by the general public that is completely free software. The GNOME project provides two things: The GNOME desktop environment, an intuitive and attractive desktop for users, and the GNOME development platform, an extensive framework for building applications that integrate into the rest of the desktop.

Loading...
similarCompanies

GNOME Foundation Similar Companies

Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics

On the Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics Team, we build dynamic partnerships between people and intelligent machines. This intricate collaboration helps Amazon fulfill orders with unmatched accuracy. Since we began working with robotics, we've added over a million new jobs worldwide. Working in s

About KPIT KPIT is reimagining the future of mobility, forging ahead with group companies and partners to shape a world that is cleaner, smarter, and safer. With over 25 years of specialized expertise in Mobility, KPIT is accelerating the transformation towards Software and AI-Defined Vehicles thr

Expedia Group

At Expedia Group (NASDAQ: EXPE), we believe travel is a force for good – it opens minds, builds connections, and bridges divides. We create transformative tech that enables unforgettable experiences for all travelers, everywhere. Our trusted family of brands are known and loved by millions, and we p

Instagram

More than one billion people around the world use Instagram, and we’re proud to be bringing them closer to the people and things they love. Instagram inspires people to see the world differently, discover new interests, and express themselves. Since launching in 2010, our community has grown at a r

Meituan

Adhering to the ‘Retail + Technology’ strategy, Meituan commits to its mission that 'We help people eat better, live better'. Since its establishment in March 2010, Meituan has advanced the digital upgrading of services and goods retail on both supply and demand sides. Together with our partners we

Cadence

Cadence is a market leader in AI and digital twins, pioneering the application of computational software to accelerate innovation in the engineering design of silicon to systems. Our design solutions, based on Cadence’s Intelligent System Design™ strategy, are essential for the world’s leading semic

PedidosYa

We’re  the delivery market leader in Latin America. Our platform connects over 77.000 restaurants, supermarkets, pharmacies and stores with millions of users. Nowadays we operate in more than 500 cities in Latinamerica. And we are now over 3.400 employees. PedidosYa is available for iOS, Android and

Cisco

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its customers, partners and communities

Instacart

Instacart, the leading grocery technology company in North America, works with grocers and retailers to transform how people shop. The company partners with more than 1,500 national, regional, and local retail banners to facilitate online shopping, delivery and pickup services from more than 85,000

newsone

GNOME Foundation CyberSecurity News

January 15, 2026 12:18 AM
Ubuntu Linux-maker Canonical joins GNOME Foundation advisory board

Ubuntu is a great operating system, and this year it has gotten even better. Why? The maker of the distribution, Canonical, ditched the much-maligned Unity.

January 14, 2026 04:08 PM
Mystery donor pledges $1 million to The GNOME Foundation

Despite being the default desktop environment for the two most important Linux distributions in the world -- Fedora and Ubuntu -- GNOME is not a...

January 14, 2026 06:08 AM
GNOME Foundation and Endless announce Coding Education Challenge

The majority of people in the world are illiterate -- including myself. No, I am not talking about being unable to read or write English or another language...

January 14, 2026 01:51 AM
Leadership changes at GNOME Foundation: Should DEI influence the selection of a new director?

The GNOME Foundation has announced Holly Million is stepping down as Executive Director, with Richard Littauer stepping in as Interim Executive Director.

September 03, 2025 07:00 AM
GNOME Foundation boss exits after just four months

The GNOME Foundation is once again hunting for a new boss after executive director Steven Deobald departed less than four months into the...

December 18, 2024 08:00 AM
Multiple GStreamer Vulnerabilities Impact Linux Distributions Using GNOME

A recent security investigation has uncovered a series of vulnerabilities in GStreamer, the open-source multimedia framework integral to...

December 06, 2023 08:00 AM
Kali Linux 2023.4 Released With New Hacking Tools

Offensive Security releases Kali Linux 2023.4, the latest version of the popular operating system, as 2023 comes to a close and the holiday season draws near.

May 21, 2020 07:00 AM
Open Source GNOME Foundation Settles With Patent Troll

The open source GNOME Foundation has won the right to freely use a patent it was being sued over by notorious patent troll,...

April 11, 2018 07:00 AM
System76 becomes GNOME Foundation Advisory Board member

System76 has long been a huge champion of both Linux and open source. If you aren't familiar, the company sells premium computers running...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

GNOME Foundation CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of GNOME Foundation

The official website of GNOME Foundation is https://foundation.gnome.org/.

GNOME Foundation’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, GNOME Foundation’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 751, reflecting their Fair security posture.

How many security badges does GNOME Foundation’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, GNOME Foundation currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has GNOME Foundation been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, GNOME Foundation has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does GNOME Foundation have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, GNOME Foundation is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does GNOME Foundation have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, GNOME Foundation does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does GNOME Foundation comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, GNOME Foundation is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does GNOME Foundation have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, GNOME Foundation does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does GNOME Foundation comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, GNOME Foundation is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does GNOME Foundation have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,GNOME Foundation is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of GNOME Foundation

GNOME Foundation operates primarily in the Software Development industry.

Number of Employees at GNOME Foundation

GNOME Foundation employs approximately 107 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by GNOME Foundation

GNOME Foundation presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

GNOME Foundation’s LinkedIn Followers

GNOME Foundation’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 22,028 followers.

NAICS Classification of GNOME Foundation

GNOME Foundation is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

GNOME Foundation’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, GNOME Foundation does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

GNOME Foundation’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, GNOME Foundation maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/gnome-foundation.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving GNOME Foundation

As of January 22, 2026, Rankiteo reports that GNOME Foundation has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

GNOME Foundation has an estimated 28,140 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at GNOME Foundation ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.

How does GNOME Foundation detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with disabling gnome-remote-desktop service using systemctl commands, containment measures with blocking port 3389, containment measures with network segmentation, containment measures with access control policies, and network segmentation with implement network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring with monitor for unusual resource consumption patterns..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Title: GNOME Remote Desktop Vulnerability (CVE-2025-5024)

Description: A severe security vulnerability affecting GNOME Remote Desktop has been discovered, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust system resources and crash critical processes.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-05-21

Type: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Attack Vector: Network-based exploitation with low complexity

Vulnerability Exploited: CWE-400

Motivation: Denial of Service

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through RDP connections.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Uncontrolled Resource Consumption GNO138052625

Systems Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions 8, 9, 10Debian versions 11, 12, 13Ubuntu versions 25.04, 24.10, 24.04 LTS, 22.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS

Operational Impact: Persistent denial-of-service via resource exhaustion

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Uncontrolled Resource Consumption GNO138052625

Entity Name: Red Hat

Entity Type: Software Vendor

Industry: Technology

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Uncontrolled Resource Consumption GNO138052625

Containment Measures: Disabling gnome-remote-desktop service using systemctl commandsBlocking port 3389Network segmentationAccess control policies

Network Segmentation: Implement network segmentation

Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor for unusual resource consumption patterns

Data Breach Information

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by disabling gnome-remote-desktop service using systemctl commands, blocking port 3389, network segmentation, access control policies and .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Uncontrolled Resource Consumption GNO138052625

Recommendations: Disable gnome-remote-desktop service until patches are available, Implement firewall configurations to block port 3389, Use network segmentation and access control policies, Monitor for unusual resource consumption patternsDisable gnome-remote-desktop service until patches are available, Implement firewall configurations to block port 3389, Use network segmentation and access control policies, Monitor for unusual resource consumption patternsDisable gnome-remote-desktop service until patches are available, Implement firewall configurations to block port 3389, Use network segmentation and access control policies, Monitor for unusual resource consumption patternsDisable gnome-remote-desktop service until patches are available, Implement firewall configurations to block port 3389, Use network segmentation and access control policies, Monitor for unusual resource consumption patterns

What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Implement firewall configurations to block port 3389, Disable gnome-remote-desktop service until patches are available, Use network segmentation and access control policies and Monitor for unusual resource consumption patterns.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Uncontrolled Resource Consumption GNO138052625

Source: Red Hat Security Advisory

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Red Hat Security Advisory.

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Uncontrolled Resource Consumption GNO138052625

Entry Point: RDP connections

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Uncontrolled Resource Consumption GNO138052625

Root Causes: Malformed RDP PDUs triggering excessive resource consumption

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Monitor for unusual resource consumption patterns.

Additional Questions

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-05-21.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions 8, 9, 10Debian versions 11, 12, 13Ubuntu versions 25.04, 24.10, 24.04 LTS, 22.04 LTS, 20.04 LTS.

Response to the Incidents

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Disabling gnome-remote-desktop service using systemctl commandsBlocking port 3389Network segmentationAccess control policies.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Implement firewall configurations to block port 3389, Disable gnome-remote-desktop service until patches are available, Use network segmentation and access control policies and Monitor for unusual resource consumption patterns.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Red Hat Security Advisory.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an RDP connections.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=gnome-foundation' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge