Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATIONGMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION
VS
Save the Children InternationalSave the Children International
GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION

GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION

N/A

Last Update: 30/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://gmrvf.gmrgroup.in/
762/1000Fair

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:105
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Save the Children International

Save the Children International

1 St. Johns Lane , London, England, GB, EC1M 4BL 

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

Save the Children Save the Children is the world's leading independent organisation for children. We work in around 120 countries. Our vision is to live in a world in which every child attains the right to survival, protection, development and participation. Last...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:17,354
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION

GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Save the Children International

Save the Children International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Save the Children International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Save the Children International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Save the Children International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION

GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Save the Children International

Save the Children International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SAV115717923

FAQ

Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION company and Save the Children International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION and Save the Children International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION and Save the Children International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION or Save the Children International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION or Save the Children International ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION and Save the Children International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GMR VARALAKSHMI FOUNDATION and Save the Children International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1