Comparison Overview

GMR Group

VS

PCL Construction

GMR Group

New Udaan Bhawan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110037, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

GMR Group is a leading global infrastructure conglomerate with significant expertise in airports, energy, transportation, and urban infrastructure. GMR Airports is Asia’s largest private airport operator with the world’s 2nd largest passenger handling capacity (over 100 million annually). It operates key airports like Delhi, India’s largest and fastest-growing airport, Hyderabad, an innovative greenfield airport, and New Goa, India's first destination airport. Expanding its overseas footprint, the company is developing Kualanamu International Airport in Medan, Indonesia, (with Angkasa Pura II) and provides technical services to the renowned Mactan Cebu International in the Philippines. The Group is also currently developing two major greenfield airport projects in India and Greece. As a pioneer in implementing the path-breaking Aerotropolis concept in India, GMR Airports is also developing unique airport cities around its airports in Delhi, Hyderabad, and Goa. GMR Aero Technic is India’s largest integrated world-class third-party MRO and provides complete technical support to aircraft operators. GMR’s energy businesses have an installed capacity of over 3,000 MW capacity. With a significant focus on green energy, the company fosters sustainability by harnessing the power of wind, water, and sun for energy generation. The Transportation and Urban Infrastructure division focuses on surface transport projects including Roads, Railways, and Airstrips/ Runways. The Group’s EPC business is working on the design and construction of the prestigious Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor project of DFCCI (Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India). GMR Group is also developing a multi-focus Special Investment Region in Tamil Nadu. The GMR Varalakshmi Foundation, the group's CSR arm, aims to enhance people's lives by improving skills, education, and healthcare infrastructure, fostering a better quality of life generally wherever the Group has business presence.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 16,159
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PCL Construction

9915-56th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, CA, T6E 5L7
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

PCL is a group of independent construction companies that carries out work across Canada, the United States, the Caribbean, and in Australia. These diverse operations in the civil infrastructure, heavy industrial, and buildings markets are supported by a strategic presence in 31 major centers. PCL is 100% employee-owned. Watch us build at www.pcl.com

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 11,853
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gmr-group.jpeg
GMR Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcl-construction.jpeg
PCL Construction
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GMR Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PCL Construction
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GMR Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PCL Construction in 2025.

Incident History — GMR Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GMR Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PCL Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PCL Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gmr-group.jpeg
GMR Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pcl-construction.jpeg
PCL Construction
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

GMR Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PCL Construction company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PCL Construction company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GMR Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, PCL Construction company and GMR Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PCL Construction company nor GMR Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

PCL Construction company has disclosed at least one data breach, while GMR Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PCL Construction company nor GMR Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GMR Group company nor PCL Construction company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GMR Group nor PCL Construction holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GMR Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PCL Construction company.

GMR Group company employs more people globally than PCL Construction company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither GMR Group nor PCL Construction holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GMR Group nor PCL Construction holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GMR Group nor PCL Construction holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GMR Group nor PCL Construction holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GMR Group nor PCL Construction holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GMR Group nor PCL Construction holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N