Comparison Overview
GM Defense
GM Defense
25 Massachusetts Ave N.W., Washington, 20001, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Official LinkedIn page for General Motors Defense. GM Defense delivers integrated vehicles, power and propulsion, and autonomy and connectivity solutions to global defense, security, and government markets. The exceptional reliability of GM Defense’s technologies resu...
General Dynamics
11011 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 22/09/2026
From Gulfstream business jets and combat vehicles to nuclear-powered submarines and communications systems, people around the world depend on our products and services for their safety and security. General Dynamics is headquartered in Reston, Virginia, and employs ove...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
GM Defense
General Dynamics
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GM Defense in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
General Dynamics has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - GM Defense (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GM Defense cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - General Dynamics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Dynamics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
GM Defense
General Dynamics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was detected in erzhongxmu JEEWMS up to 2026.09.27-W39. Impacted is the function docheck of the file src/main/java/com/zzjee/wm/controller/WmOmNoticeHController.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument goodscode results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A security vulnerability has been detected in bleenco abstruse up to 2.1.0. This issue affects the function filepath.Join of the file server/api/worker/download_cache.go of the component Cache Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A weakness has been identified in Appwrite up to 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects the function PublicHostname of the file src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Avatars/Http/Screenshots/Get.php of the component Browser Screenshot Service. This manipulation of the argument url causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.4.0 is able to resolve this issue. Patch name: 393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe. You should upgrade the affected component.
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/commit/393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/pull/13995
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/releases/tag/2.4.0
- https://github.com/godzeo/vulhub/issues/2
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108770
- https://vuldb.com/submit/958017
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/416552
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/416552/cti
Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Samsung Opensource rlottie allows Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables. This issue affects rlottie: e57b094f03c39a751a1fded6f7d6c13f1ed95ec9.
A security flaw has been discovered in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file Markdown.tsx of the component Markdown Rendering. The manipulation results in denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.