Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Global Enterprise PartnersGlobal Enterprise Partners
VS
IBMIBM
Global Enterprise Partners

Global Enterprise Partners

Gustav Mahlerplein 28, Amsterdam, NL, 1082MA

Last Update: 07/02/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Building tomorrow’s enterprise systems, today Global Enterprise Partners is an Enterprise Technology specialist, part of SThree, the global STEM workforce consultancy. With expertise in SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics and Salesforce projects, Global Enterprise Partners...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:69
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IBM

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US

Last Update: 04/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ibm.com
403/1000Critical

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:336,062
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
9
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Global Enterprise Partners

Global Enterprise Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IBM

IBM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Enterprise Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

IBM has 773.79% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Global Enterprise Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Enterprise Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Global Enterprise Partners

Global Enterprise Partners

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IBM

IBM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
IBM1785746071
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785357547
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785321873

FAQ

Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners company and IBM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Global Enterprise Partners or IBM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Global Enterprise Partners or IBM ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners and IBM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Global Enterprise Partners and IBM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA