Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc.Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc.
VS
Claro BrasilClaro Brasil
Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc.

Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc.

1725 Louisville Rd, Knoxville, 37921, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
668/1000Weak

Founded in 1999, Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. has become a leader in the telecommunications and utility construction industries. Our growth is fueled by a commitment to innovation and excellence, allowing us to provide advanced services that enhan...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Claro Brasil

Claro Brasil

Rua Henri Dunant, 780, São Paulo, 04709-110, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.claro.com.br
804/1000Good

Prazer, somos a Claro! Aqui, temos um grande time que faz tudo acontecer! É com o esforço e a dedicação de cada uma de nossas Pessoas que somos hoje referência no que fazemos, atuando unidos no nosso propósito, que é “Conectar para uma vida mais divertida e produtiva”....

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:41,989
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc.

Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Claro Brasil

Claro Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Claro Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Claro Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Claro Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc.

Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GLO845050725
Claro Brasil

Claro Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. company and Claro Brasil company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. and Claro Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. and Claro Brasil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. or Claro Brasil ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. or Claro Brasil ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. and Claro Brasil, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Global Communications & Professional Services, Inc. and Claro Brasil, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9