Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North CarolinaGlobal Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina
VS
SoftServeSoftServe
Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina

Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina

11010 Park Charlotte Blvd, Charlotte, 28273, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gls.com
754/1000Fair

GLS is a managed network and security services provider founded in 1998. We currently do business in 122 countries across the globe. Our focus has been on the deployment of optimized network designs that improve security, drive high availability and improve performance....

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:247
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
SoftServe

SoftServe

201 W 5th Street , Austin, 78701, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.softserveinc.com
781/1000Fair

SoftServe is a premier IT consulting and digital services provider. We expand the horizon of new technologies to solve today's complex business challenges and achieve meaningful outcomes for our clients. Our boundless curiosity drives us to explore and reimagine the art...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,373
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina

Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SoftServe

SoftServe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoftServe in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SoftServe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoftServe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina

Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GLO001082524
SoftServe

SoftServe

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina company and SoftServe company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina and SoftServe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina and SoftServe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina or SoftServe ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina or SoftServe ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina and SoftServe, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Global Linking Solutions, Charlotte, North Carolina and SoftServe, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2