Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Global Fashion GroupGlobal Fashion Group
VS
Arrow ElectronicsArrow Electronics
Global Fashion Group

Global Fashion Group

5, Heienhaff, Senningerberg, Luxembourg, RCS Luxembourg B 190.907, LU

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

Global Fashion Group is the leading fashion and lifestyle destination in LATAM, SEA and ANZ. From our people to our customers and partners, we exist to empower everyone to express their true selves through fashion. Our three ecommerce platforms: Dafiti, ZALORA and THE I...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:6,571
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Arrow Electronics

Arrow Electronics

9201 East Dry Creek Road, Centennial, 80112, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

Arrow Electronics (NYSE:ARW) guides innovation forward for thousands of leading technology manufacturers and service providers. With 2024 sales of $27.9 billion, Arrow develops technology solutions that help improve business and daily life. Our broad portfolio that spa...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:21,599
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Global Fashion Group

Global Fashion Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Arrow Electronics

Arrow Electronics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Fashion Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arrow Electronics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Global Fashion Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Fashion Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Arrow Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arrow Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Global Fashion Group

Global Fashion Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Arrow Electronics

Arrow Electronics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ARR408070825

FAQ

Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Global Fashion Group company and Arrow Electronics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Global Fashion Group and Arrow Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Global Fashion Group and Arrow Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Global Fashion Group or Arrow Electronics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Global Fashion Group or Arrow Electronics ?
Between Global Fashion Group and Arrow Electronics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Global Fashion Group and Arrow Electronics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA