Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s.GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s.
VS
HelloFreshHelloFresh
GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s.

GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s.

Dopraváků 749/3, 184 00 Praha 8, CZ

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. je asistenční společnost, založena v roce 2004, která zajišťuje široké spektrum služeb v České republice, služby pro motoristy po celé Evropě a zdravotní asistenci po celém světě. Poskytuje komplexní asistenční služby a pečuje o své klienty v nouz...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:82
Subsidiaries:55
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HelloFresh

HelloFresh

Prinzenstraße 89, Berlin, 10969, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

HelloFresh is on a mission to change the way people eat, forever! From our 2011 founding in Europe’s vibrant tech hub Berlin, we’re evolving from the world’s leading meal kit company to the world's leading food solutions group. We delivered 243.3 million meals and reac...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:16,889
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s.

GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HelloFresh

HelloFresh

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HelloFresh in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HelloFresh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HelloFresh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s.

GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HelloFresh

HelloFresh

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. company and HelloFresh company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. and HelloFresh, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. and HelloFresh, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. or HelloFresh ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. or HelloFresh ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. and HelloFresh, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GLOBAL ASSISTANCE a.s. and HelloFresh, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9