Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú)GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú)
VS
Marubeni CorporationMarubeni Corporation
GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú)

GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú)

N/A

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.giz.de/
753/1000Fair

La cooperación alemana para el desarrollo, implementada por la Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, asiste al Gobierno de la República Federal de Alemania para alcanzar sus objetivos en los ámbitos de la cooperación internacional para el d...

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:108
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marubeni Corporation

Marubeni Corporation

4-2, Ohtemachi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, 1008088, JP

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.marubeni.com/en
816/1000Good

Marubeni Corporation (TSE securities code: 8002) is one of Japan’s largest trading companies (sogo shosha) with more than 165 years of history. Headquartered in Tokyo, Marubeni continues to expand its businesses across the globe, with 130 branches and offices worldwide....

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:10,224
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú)

GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marubeni Corporation

Marubeni Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marubeni Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marubeni Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marubeni Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú)

GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marubeni Corporation

Marubeni Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) and Marubeni Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) and Marubeni Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) or Marubeni Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) or Marubeni Corporation ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) and Marubeni Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GIZ ConoSur (Argentina, Chile, Perú) and Marubeni Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1