Comparison Overview

Givaudan

VS

LyondellBasell

Givaudan

Givaudan International SA, 5, Chemin de la Parfumerie, Vernier, Geneva, CH, 1214
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.givaudan.com

Givaudan is a global leader in Fragrance & Beauty and Taste & Wellbeing. We celebrate the beauty of human experience by creating for happier, healthier lives with love for nature. Together with our customers we deliver food experiences, craft inspired fragrances, and develop beauty and wellbeing solutions that make people look and feel good. With over 163 locations in 52 countries and over 78 production sites, of which 31 are located in Europe, 22 in North America, 17 in Latin America, 8 in Asia-Pacific, and 1 across South Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, we are committed to driving purpose-led growth that makes a positive impact. Givaudan: Human by nature. www.givaudan.com

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 13,029
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell Tower, Ste. 700, 1221 McKinney Street, Houston, TX, US, 77010
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lyondellbasell.com

We are LyondellBasell (NYSE: LYB) – a leader in the global chemical industry creating solutions for everyday sustainable living. Through advanced technology and focused investments, we are enabling a circular and low carbon economy. Across all we do, we aim to unlock value for our customers, investors and society. As one of the world's largest producers of polymers and a leader in polyolefin technologies, we develop, manufacture and market high-quality and innovative products for applications ranging from sustainable transportation and food safety to clean water and quality healthcare. For more information, please visit www.lyondellbasell.com.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 13,394
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/givaudan.jpeg
Givaudan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyondell-basell.jpeg
LyondellBasell
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Givaudan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LyondellBasell
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Givaudan in 2025.

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LyondellBasell in 2025.

Incident History — Givaudan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Givaudan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LyondellBasell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LyondellBasell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/givaudan.jpeg
Givaudan
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyondell-basell.jpeg
LyondellBasell
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Givaudan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LyondellBasell company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LyondellBasell company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Givaudan company.

In the current year, LyondellBasell company and Givaudan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LyondellBasell company nor Givaudan company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LyondellBasell company nor Givaudan company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LyondellBasell company nor Givaudan company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Givaudan company nor LyondellBasell company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Givaudan nor LyondellBasell holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both LyondellBasell company and Givaudan company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

LyondellBasell company employs more people globally than Givaudan company, reflecting its scale as a Chemical Manufacturing.

Neither Givaudan nor LyondellBasell holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Givaudan nor LyondellBasell holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Givaudan nor LyondellBasell holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Givaudan nor LyondellBasell holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Givaudan nor LyondellBasell holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Givaudan nor LyondellBasell holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References