Comparison Overview

Givaudan

VS

INEOS

Givaudan

Givaudan International SA, 5, Chemin de la Parfumerie, Vernier, Geneva, CH, 1214
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Givaudan is a global leader in Fragrance & Beauty and Taste & Wellbeing. We celebrate the beauty of human experience by creating for happier, healthier lives with love for nature. Together with our customers we deliver food experiences, craft inspired fragrances, and develop beauty and wellbeing solutions that make people look and feel good. With over 163 locations in 52 countries and over 78 production sites, of which 31 are located in Europe, 22 in North America, 17 in Latin America, 8 in Asia-Pacific, and 1 across South Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, we are committed to driving purpose-led growth that makes a positive impact. Givaudan: Human by nature. www.givaudan.com

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 13,029
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

INEOS

38 Hans Crescent, London, SW1X 0LZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We are a global manufacturer of raw materials and a producer of energy used in everyday life. From medicines to mobile phones, agriculture to automotive, our products enhance standards of living for everyone around the world. We understand the challenge the world is facing, and we are working hard to help economies, businesses and individuals deliver a zero carbon emissions future to meet the commitments of the Paris Agreement. Our plans and actions revolve around implementing carbon emission reduction, making safe and sustainable products, investing in the energy transition, all while creating jobs, improving living standards worldwide. But we wouldn't be able to achieve any of these without our 26,000 dedicated and talented colleagues. It is why we celebrate and reward individuals and teams who strive to push boundaries to constantly innovate and find new and better ways of doing things.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 12,139
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/givaudan.jpeg
Givaudan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ineos.jpeg
INEOS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Givaudan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
INEOS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Givaudan in 2025.

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INEOS in 2025.

Incident History — Givaudan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Givaudan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — INEOS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INEOS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/givaudan.jpeg
Givaudan
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ineos.jpeg
INEOS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Givaudan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to INEOS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, INEOS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Givaudan company.

In the current year, INEOS company and Givaudan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither INEOS company nor Givaudan company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither INEOS company nor Givaudan company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither INEOS company nor Givaudan company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Givaudan company nor INEOS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Givaudan nor INEOS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

INEOS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Givaudan company.

Givaudan company employs more people globally than INEOS company, reflecting its scale as a Chemical Manufacturing.

Neither Givaudan nor INEOS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Givaudan nor INEOS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Givaudan nor INEOS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Givaudan nor INEOS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Givaudan nor INEOS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Givaudan nor INEOS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N