Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GitHub BrasilGitHub Brasil
VS
NielsenNielsen
GitHub Brasil

GitHub Brasil

N/A

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.github.com
751/1000Fair

O GitHub é a maior e mais avançada plataforma de desenvolvimento de softwares do mundo. Mais de 94 milhões de pessoas usam nossa plataforma para criar coisas incríveis junto dos amigos, colegas de trabalho, de faculdade e até com completos desconhecidos de todos os cant...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:12
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nielsen

Nielsen

675 6th Ave, New York, 10011, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://nlsn.co/6006JMfty
804/1000Good

Nielsen shapes the world’s media and content as a global leader in audience insights, data and analytics. Through our understanding of people and their behaviors across all channels and platforms, we empower our clients with independent and actionable intelligence so th...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:29,059
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GitHub Brasil

GitHub Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nielsen

Nielsen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GitHub Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nielsen in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GitHub Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GitHub Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nielsen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nielsen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GitHub Brasil

GitHub Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nielsen

Nielsen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GitHub Brasil company and Nielsen company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GitHub Brasil and Nielsen, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GitHub Brasil and Nielsen, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GitHub Brasil or Nielsen ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GitHub Brasil or Nielsen ?
Between GitHub Brasil and Nielsen, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GitHub Brasil and Nielsen, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9