Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ginori 1735Ginori 1735
VS
LVMHLVMH
Ginori 1735

Ginori 1735

Viale Giulio Cesare, 50, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, IT, 50019

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ginori1735.com
763/1000Fair

GINORI 1735 has been for three centuries one of the main global brands in the field of luxury and lifestyle, the expression of Italian excellence in pure porcelain and in design. Part of Kering Group since 2013, GINORI 1735 has always been associated with great figures...

NAICS:4483
NAICS Definition:Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees:173
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LVMH

LVMH

22, avenue Montaigne, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 18/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lvmh.com
715/1000Moderate

LVMH is the world leader in luxury. A family group founded in 1987 and headed by Chairman and CEO Bernard Arnault, LVMH is now home to 75 iconic Maisons, which embody a distinctive art de vivre blending heritage and modernity. With reported sales of 86.2 billion euros ...

NAICS:4483
NAICS Definition:Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees:147,344
Subsidiaries:75
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ginori 1735

Ginori 1735

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LVMH

LVMH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ginori 1735 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)

LVMH has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Ginori 1735 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ginori 1735 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LVMH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LVMH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ginori 1735

Ginori 1735

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LVMH

LVMH

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TIFLVMCHR1770865579
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAI0292402112125
🔒 Incident : Breach
LVM852071225

FAQ

Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ginori 1735 company and LVMH company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ginori 1735 and LVMH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ginori 1735 and LVMH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ginori 1735 or LVMH ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ginori 1735 or LVMH ?
Between Ginori 1735 and LVMH, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ginori 1735 and LVMH, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA