Comparison Overview
Gi BPO

Gi BPO
Piazza Quattro Novembre, 5, Milan, 20124, IT
Last Update: 16/12/2025
Gi BPO Advanced Outsourcing is a leader in the field of Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) & Business Transformation Outsourcing (BTO) solutions. We offer customized solutions and advanced services to improve our customers’ productivity, efficiency, flexibility and comp...

VFS Global
Unit 201, Level 2, Gate Village 8, DIFC, P.O. Box 114100, Dubai, AE
Last Update: 29/03/2026
As the global leader in trusted technology services, empowering secure mobility for governments and citizens, VFS Global embraces technological innovation including Generative AI to support governments and diplomatic missions worldwide. VFS Global continuously transform...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Gi BPO







VFS Global






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gi BPO in 2026.
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VFS Global in 2026.
Incident History - Gi BPO (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gi BPO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VFS Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VFS Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Gi BPO

VFS Global
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.