Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GIGABYTEGIGABYTE
VS
NVIDIANVIDIA
GIGABYTE

GIGABYTE

No.6, Baoqiang Rd., Xindian Dist., 231, TW

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.gigabyte.com
727/1000Moderate

GIGABYTE is an engineer, innovator, and leader in the tech world that offers a complete product and service portfolio of different scales to accelerate individuals and businesses in reaching their potential. GIGABYTE uses its hardware expertise, patented innovations, an...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:1,987
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

2701 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95050

Last Update: 17/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nvidia.com
791/1000Fair

Since its founding in 1993, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been a pioneer in accelerated computing. The company’s invention of the GPU in 1999 sparked the growth of the PC gaming market, redefined computer graphics, ignited the era of modern AI and is fueling the creation of...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:44,040
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GIGABYTE

GIGABYTE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GIGABYTE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

NVIDIA has 554.21% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - GIGABYTE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GIGABYTE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NVIDIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NVIDIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GIGABYTE

GIGABYTE

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GIG820071525
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GIG13518322
NVIDIA

NVIDIA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NVI1781685010
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SER1781072827
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OKTMICATTNVI1780611852

FAQ

Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GIGABYTE company and NVIDIA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GIGABYTE and NVIDIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GIGABYTE and NVIDIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GIGABYTE or NVIDIA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GIGABYTE or NVIDIA ?
Between GIGABYTE and NVIDIA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GIGABYTE and NVIDIA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3