Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BeslerBesler
VS
AmbevAmbev
Besler

Besler

Ferah Caddesi, Üsküdar, Istanbul, TR, 34692

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.besler.com.tr/tr
766/1000Fair

Yıldız Holding'in halka açık ikinci büyük gıda şirketi olan Besler, 16 farklı kategoride yaklaşık 1.500 ürün ve 57 markası ile her yıl yaklaşık 61 milyon tabakta 19,5 milyon haneye misafir oluyor. Kurulduğumuz ilk günden bu yana, şirketimiz ve bağlı ortaklıklarımızla b...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:497
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ambev

Ambev

São Paulo, São Paulo, 04530-001, BR

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ambev.com.br
821/1000Good

Hey there! Welcome. Here at Ambev, there are lots of people and amazing projects beyond our labels! Let’s talk about that. We believe that having a big dream requires just the same effort as having a small one. That is why our big dream began back in the 1880s, with...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:75,042
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Besler

Besler

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ambev

Ambev

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Besler in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ambev in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Besler (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Besler cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ambev (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ambev cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Besler

Besler

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ambev

Ambev

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Besler company and Ambev company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Besler and Ambev, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Besler and Ambev, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Besler or Ambev ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Besler or Ambev ?
Between Besler and Ambev, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Besler and Ambev, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-88964
SUMMARY

An integer underflow in OpenVPN version 2.7_alpha3 through 2.7.7 on Windows and Android allows remote authenticated servers to cause a denial of service or memory disclosure via crafted domain search options

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-53564
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in Citrix UniconOS leading to Arbitrary file read and write This issue affects UniconOS: before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-53563
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in Citrix UniconOS leading to Persistent Command Execution This issue affects UniconOS: before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-15468
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in HYPR Passwordless on Windows allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects HYPR Passwordless: before 11.3.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105390
SUMMARY

Improper synchronization in the OpenVPN ovpn-dco-win for Windows versions 0.6.5 through 1.3.5 and 2.4.0 through 2.8.7 allows local attackers to trigger a deadlock via a crafted write to the ovpn-dco device, causing the host to become unresponsive.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-13
UPDATED
Date2026-10-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES