Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Giant GroupGiant Group
VS
Zebra TechnologiesZebra Technologies
Giant Group

Giant Group

fourth floor, 90 high holborn, , London, London, GB, WC1V 6LJ

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.giantgroup.com
701/1000Moderate

Since 1992 Giant have provided specialist, end to end workforce management software and support services to large and small recruitment agencies, internationally. We invest heavily in our cloud-based software which ranges from candidate sourcing and onboarding through ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:535
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Zebra Technologies

Zebra Technologies

3 Overlook Point, Lincolnshire, IL, US, 60069

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zebra.com
780/1000Fair

Zebra provides the foundation for intelligent operations with an award-winning portfolio of connected frontline, asset visibility and automation solutions. Organizations globally across retail, manufacturing, transportation, logistics, healthcare, and other industries r...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:11,660
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Giant Group

Giant Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Zebra Technologies

Zebra Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Giant Group has 34.21% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zebra Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Giant Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Giant Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Zebra Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zebra Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Giant Group

Giant Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GIA1777567091
Zebra Technologies

Zebra Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Giant Group company and Zebra Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Giant Group and Zebra Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Giant Group and Zebra Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Giant Group or Zebra Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Giant Group or Zebra Technologies ?
Between Giant Group and Zebra Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Giant Group and Zebra Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-50044
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an inadequate encryption strength vulnerability which could allow an attacker to steal admin credentials via weak hash or a pass-the-hash attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-44955
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could allow for asset discovery by unauthenticated users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42933
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an unintended proxy or intermediary vulnerability which could allow an attacker to use an active proxy, which would bypass OT segmentation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-40430
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE Versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have a plaintext storage of a password vulnerability that could expose cleartext credentials through the API.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-28698
SUMMARY

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could expose the underlying host/share filesystem.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-23
UPDATED
Date2026-07-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9