Comparison Overview
GHX

GHX
3615 Delgany St, Denver, 80216, US
Last Update: 20/02/2026
GHX is a software-as-a-service company that’s reducing the cost of doing business in healthcare by automating supply chain processes and improving visibility into the products used in patient care. We’ve built the GHX Global Network, the world’s largest community of hea...

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, GB
Last Update: 07/06/2026
One of the largest Trusts in the UK, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust comprises five of the UK’s best known hospitals – Guy’s, St Thomas’, Evelina London Children’s Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield – as well as community services in Lambeth and Southwark,...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

GHX







Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GHX in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust in 2026.
Incident History - GHX (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GHX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

GHX

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.