Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GhostGhost
VS
Mercado LibreMercado Libre
Ghost

Ghost

New York, US

Last Update: 26/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://ghost.org
736/1000Moderate

The world has changed, and media is struggling to change with it. The internet fuelled advertising-driven business models where all that mattered was capturing as many eyeballs as possible. The resulting economy brought us clickbait, outrage, fake news, and a fraught co...

NAICS:51913
NAICS Definition:Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees:119
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Mercado Libre

Mercado Libre

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1430DNN, AR

Last Update: 17/07/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

At Mercado Libre, we are transforming the way people buy, sell, advertise, pay, finance, and ship across Latin America. We are the leading e-commerce and fintech company in the region, with a presence in 18 countries and a team of more than 130,000 people. We are one o...

NAICS:51913
NAICS Definition:Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees:69,455
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ghost

Ghost

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mercado Libre

Mercado Libre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

Ghost has 41.18% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Internet Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

Mercado Libre has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Ghost (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ghost cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mercado Libre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercado Libre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ghost

Ghost

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DUCHARGHO1779798590
Mercado Libre

Mercado Libre

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MER1783492030
🔒 Incident : Breach
MER04623322

FAQ

Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ghost company and Mercado Libre company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ghost and Mercado Libre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ghost and Mercado Libre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ghost or Mercado Libre ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ghost or Mercado Libre ?
Between Ghost and Mercado Libre, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ghost and Mercado Libre, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8