Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ghirardelli Chocolate CompanyGhirardelli Chocolate Company
VS
Rodan + FieldsRodan + Fields
Ghirardelli Chocolate Company

Ghirardelli Chocolate Company

1111 139th Avenue, San Leandro, CA, 94578, US

Last Update: 23/01/2026

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Founded in 1852, the Ghirardelli Chocolate Company is a manufacturer and marketer of premium chocolate products. Ghirardelli is one of the few companies in America that controls the entire chocolate manufacturing process, from cocoa bean to finished product. This contro...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:1,077
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rodan + Fields

Rodan + Fields

60 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA, US, 94105

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
782/1000Fair

We are Rodan + Fields, founded by Stanford-trained dermatologists with a mission to revolutionize skincare for women everywhere. Our products are dermatologist-developed and inspired by Women-Backed Science™, delivering real, visible results. We understand what works f...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:18,226
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ghirardelli Chocolate Company

Ghirardelli Chocolate Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rodan + Fields

Rodan + Fields

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ghirardelli Chocolate Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rodan + Fields in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ghirardelli Chocolate Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ghirardelli Chocolate Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rodan + Fields (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rodan + Fields cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ghirardelli Chocolate Company

Ghirardelli Chocolate Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rodan + Fields

Rodan + Fields

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company company and Rodan + Fields company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company and Rodan + Fields, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company and Rodan + Fields, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ghirardelli Chocolate Company or Rodan + Fields ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ghirardelli Chocolate Company or Rodan + Fields ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company and Rodan + Fields, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ghirardelli Chocolate Company and Rodan + Fields, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8