Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GHD QuébecGHD Québec
VS
EpirocEpiroc
GHD Québec

GHD Québec

4600, boulevard de la Côte-Vertu, Montréal, H4S 1C7, CA

Last Update: 28/02/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

Nous sommes engagés à répondre aux plus grands enjeux mondiaux reliés à l’eau, à l’énergie et aux communautés. GHD est un réseau mondial de professionnels multidisciplinaires qui fournit aux clients des solutions intégrées grâce à son expertise en ingénierie, en enviro...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Epiroc

Epiroc

Sickla Industriväg 19, Nacka, Stockholm, SE, 131 54

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.epiroc.com
806/1000Good

Performance to succeed today. Technology to lead tomorrow. Epiroc is your partner for mining and infrastructure equipment. We're excited to build on proven expertise and performance with the same people and a bold new drive to make what's good even better. Just lik...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:12,558
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GHD Québec

GHD Québec

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Epiroc

Epiroc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GHD Québec in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epiroc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GHD Québec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GHD Québec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Epiroc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epiroc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GHD Québec

GHD Québec

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Epiroc

Epiroc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GHD Québec company and Epiroc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GHD Québec and Epiroc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GHD Québec and Epiroc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GHD Québec or Epiroc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GHD Québec or Epiroc ?
Between GHD Québec and Epiroc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GHD Québec and Epiroc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3