Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GFWAGFWA
VS
Royal BAM GroupRoyal BAM Group
GFWA

GFWA

113 Radium Street, Welshpool, WA, 6106, AU

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gfwa.com.au
750/1000Fair

Established in the 1970s and operating since then as a leading geotechnical specialist contractor, GFWA is a member of Soletanche Bachy Group. This has given the company a unique status to provide a full range of optimised specialist geotechnical services based on its l...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:125
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Royal BAM Group

Royal BAM Group

Runnenburg 9, Bunnik, 3981 AZ, NL

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bam.com/
774/1000Fair

𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗕𝗔𝗠 Royal BAM Group nv is a leading construction and property development company listed on Euronext Amsterdam with over 150 years of experience in delivering sustainable buildings, homes and infrastructure for public and private sector clients. With appro...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:15,774
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GFWA

GFWA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Royal BAM Group

Royal BAM Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFWA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal BAM Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GFWA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFWA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Royal BAM Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal BAM Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GFWA

GFWA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Royal BAM Group

Royal BAM Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GFWA company and Royal BAM Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GFWA and Royal BAM Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GFWA and Royal BAM Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GFWA or Royal BAM Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GFWA or Royal BAM Group ?
Between GFWA and Royal BAM Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GFWA and Royal BAM Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93291
SUMMARY

Omni C20 lacks proper certificate validation which could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack which could allow them to execute arbitrary code.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93290
SUMMARY

Omni C20 uses hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to monitor log files to obtain credentials to access information like mapping data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93289
SUMMARY

The affected products are vulnerable to command injection attack that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute system commands during the pairing process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-88956
SUMMARY

The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware contains an authentication vulnerability in the root account exposed through the device's UART interface. The affected account does not require a password before granting access to a privileged system interface, and the interface also displays the device's WiFi password during startup. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device could connect to the UART interface, obtain root privileges, and recover the WiFi password.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
0.9
CVE-2026-88761
SUMMARY

The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware generates the default WiFi password using predictable device information, portions of which are advertised by the product. An unauthenticated attacker within WiFi range could potentially determine the remaining password characters through limited guessing and gain unauthorized access to the device network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6