Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GFT TechnologiesGFT Technologies
VS
IBMIBM
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Schelmenwasenstr. 34, Stuttgart, 70567, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gft.com
751/1000Fair

GFT Technologies is an AI-centric global digital transformation company. We design advanced data and AI transformation solutions, modernize technology architectures and develop next-generation core systems for industry leaders in Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing and Ro...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:13,147
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IBM

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US

Last Update: 05/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.ibm.com
656/1000Weak

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:341,860
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IBM

IBM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFT Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

IBM has 175.23% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - GFT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IBM

IBM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ANTARCFLOIBM1776659058
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SIS1777847095
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1770199486

FAQ

Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GFT Technologies company and IBM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GFT Technologies and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GFT Technologies and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GFT Technologies or IBM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GFT Technologies or IBM ?
Between GFT Technologies and IBM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GFT Technologies and IBM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48579
SUMMARY

Improper authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48567
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass by spoofing in Azure HorizonDB allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-47655
SUMMARY

Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Microsoft Graph allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-47644
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Copilot Chat (Microsoft Edge) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45497
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Copilot allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8