Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GF Piping Systems UKGF Piping Systems UK
VS
Trane TechnologiesTrane Technologies
GF Piping Systems UK

GF Piping Systems UK

Paradise Way, Coventry, West Midlands,, CV2 2ST , GB

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.gfps.com/uk
743/1000Moderate

GF Piping Systems creates connections for life as the superior water and flow solutions provider for industries and infrastructure, enabling the safe and sustainable transport of fluids. The division focuses on industry-leading leak-free piping solutions and enginee...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:36
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Trane Technologies

Trane Technologies

Davidson, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Trane Technologies is a global climate innovator advancing sustainability through our leading brands Trane® and Thermo King®, which bring efficient and sustainable climate solutions to buildings, homes and transportation across the globe. Together, we are one team innov...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:14,468
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GF Piping Systems UK

GF Piping Systems UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Trane Technologies

Trane Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GF Piping Systems UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trane Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GF Piping Systems UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GF Piping Systems UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Trane Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trane Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GF Piping Systems UK

GF Piping Systems UK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Trane Technologies

Trane Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK company and Trane Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK and Trane Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK and Trane Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GF Piping Systems UK or Trane Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GF Piping Systems UK or Trane Technologies ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK and Trane Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GF Piping Systems UK and Trane Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA