Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GFL Environmental Inc.GFL Environmental Inc.
VS
VeoliaVeolia
GFL Environmental Inc.

GFL Environmental Inc.

100 New Park Place, None, Vaughan, Ontario, CA, L4K 0H9

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gflenv.com
757/1000Fair

GFL Environmental is the only major diversified environmental services company in North America offering services in solid waste management, liquid waste management and soil remediation. Through a strategically located network of facilities across Canada and the Unite...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:7,409
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Veolia

Veolia

30, Rue Madeleine Vionnet, Aubervilliers, Île-de-France, FR, 93300

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.veolia.com/en/
799/1000Fair

Veolia group aims to be the benchmark company for ecological transformation. With nearly 220,000 employees worldwide, the Group designs and provides game-changing solutions that are both useful and practical for water, waste and energy management. Through its three comp...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:47,800
Subsidiaries:72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GFL Environmental Inc.

GFL Environmental Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Veolia

Veolia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFL Environmental Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Veolia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GFL Environmental Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFL Environmental Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Veolia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Veolia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GFL Environmental Inc.

GFL Environmental Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GFL437072725
Veolia

Veolia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. company and Veolia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. and Veolia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. and Veolia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GFL Environmental Inc. or Veolia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GFL Environmental Inc. or Veolia ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. and Veolia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GFL Environmental Inc. and Veolia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA