Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GF Hakan PlastikGF Hakan Plastik
VS
DanfossDanfoss
GF Hakan Plastik

GF Hakan Plastik

Organize Sanayi Bölgesi Gaziosmanpaşa Mah. 3.Cad. No:11-13, Tekirdağ, Çerkezköy, 59500, TR

Last Update: 07/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.gfps.com/tr
746/1000Moderate

Hakan Plastik was founded in Istanbul, Turkey, in 1965. With a workforce of 400 people, the company has production site in Çerkezköy, about 100 km north-west of Istanbul. In 2013, the leading plastic pipe manufacturer in Europe and the Middle East, Hakan Plastik an...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:209
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danfoss

Danfoss

Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, DK, 6430

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.danfoss.com
777/1000Fair

Danfoss engineers solutions that increase machine productivity, reduce emissions, lower energy consumption, and enable electrification. Our solutions are used in such areas as refrigeration, air conditioning, heating, power conversion, motor control, industrial machine...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:22,778
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GF Hakan Plastik

GF Hakan Plastik

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danfoss

Danfoss

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GF Hakan Plastik in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Danfoss has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - GF Hakan Plastik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GF Hakan Plastik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danfoss (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danfoss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GF Hakan Plastik

GF Hakan Plastik

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danfoss

Danfoss

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
REJDANDAN1774492078

FAQ

Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik company and Danfoss company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik and Danfoss, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik and Danfoss, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GF Hakan Plastik or Danfoss ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GF Hakan Plastik or Danfoss ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik and Danfoss, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GF Hakan Plastik and Danfoss, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES