Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GF Piping Systems ÖsterreichGF Piping Systems Österreich
VS
DanfossDanfoss
GF Piping Systems Österreich

GF Piping Systems Österreich

Hoferstraße 1, Loosdorf, Lower Austria, AT, 3382

Last Update: 20/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.gfps.com/at
743/1000Moderate

GF is the leading flow solutions provider for industry and infrastructure, enabling the safe and sustainable transport of fluids. The division ensures process quality with industry-leading, leakage-free, easy-to-install, and maintain flow solutions and engineering servi...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danfoss

Danfoss

Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, DK, 6430

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.danfoss.com
777/1000Fair

Danfoss engineers solutions that increase machine productivity, reduce emissions, lower energy consumption, and enable electrification. Our solutions are used in such areas as refrigeration, air conditioning, heating, power conversion, motor control, industrial machine...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:22,778
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GF Piping Systems Österreich

GF Piping Systems Österreich

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danfoss

Danfoss

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GF Piping Systems Österreich in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Danfoss has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - GF Piping Systems Österreich (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GF Piping Systems Österreich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danfoss (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danfoss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GF Piping Systems Österreich

GF Piping Systems Österreich

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danfoss

Danfoss

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
REJDANDAN1774492078

FAQ

Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich company and Danfoss company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich and Danfoss, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich and Danfoss, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GF Piping Systems Österreich or Danfoss ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GF Piping Systems Österreich or Danfoss ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich and Danfoss, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GF Piping Systems Österreich and Danfoss, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5